I've often thought that silly shape crank is a big power limiter on the four cylinder. To get power we need torque and the ability to maintain that torque at high rpm. That crank limits the rpm of those engines.
If you look at the little four cylinder Ford engines, the 10hp Prefect and Popular (Anglia) with 1172cc (71ci) the guys raving them in the 1172 formula were getting high 70's to low 80's in brake horse power at 8500 rpm. This made the little home built race cars attain speeds upto 130mph on the straight at Silverstone circuit. These were flathead engines! The rpm limit was the camshaft, by all accounts the rear cam bearing would exit the bottom of the pan at 8600-8700 rpm.
Be amazing to get one of these big fours to that level, wounder how much power could be got if you scaled up the modifications on the little fours to the big fours? The saying "no replacement for displacement" does make me smile in this case, 130mph! And the car wasn't built for outright top speed, it had to accelerate and corner and last longer than a return run of seven or so miles on straight Line salt. The guys made there own heads, some from melted down milk bottle tops for the aluminium, some ground there own cams, by hand, on an off hand grinder (bench grinder) some of these guys ran radius lifter re entry camshaft profiles ground on billets, using Austin seven radius lifters and profiles.
The A and B engines are around three times as big, with the same porting layout. Now you have a good design crank for yours, and a monkey motion head.
I'm just letting you know what I expect from you and that engine!
Only kidding, on the expectations.
Maybe,
Might be serious,
Have fun
Martin.