hotrodart
Senior Member
How about a chemical engineer that used to schedule production at a lube refinery? STP is not a lubricant. A lubricant is a branching chain paraffin. Enough said. IMHO what saves most of us from foolishly adding STP to engines is we don't drive them enough to cause severe damage by diluting the real lubricant.
"STP Oil Treatment product claims include protection against engine wear (hence, reduction of friction) and reduction of oil consumption. There are no controlled test results or relevant customer testimonials on the STP web site to document these product claims.
In 1978 STP Corporation and its then-parent company, First Brand Corporation, settled a legal action from the FTC over misrepresenting the role and benefits of motor oil additives in reducing wear inside engines. STP paid an $888,000 judgment, the third largest sum ever obtained by the FTC for a consumer protection violation."
https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hub/68152/...bell_performance_xtra_lube_four_ball_0709.pdf
Can't argue with these facts. But.....maybe there is some good that STP does in conjunction with oil......one of my buddies was a Honda factory motor cycle racer.......the Honda engineers told him to add STP to the engine oil for every change. He realized another 1000 RPM over straight oil.....seems like it did some good for him and Honda.