Just looking at the picture, you have the brake shoes in the wrong positions. With the Lockheed style here, the shoe with the longer lining goes to the rear of the car, unlike the more "modern" Bendix brakes where the shoe with the longer lining goes to the front. Ford used this style on the FORD CARS because they were less expensive. He used the "better" Bendix style on Lincolns and trucks. So, yes, there are better brakes than what you have. Many will argue, however, that when these are properly set up and adjusted, these should be OK.
I have a set of (I think) early 40's brakes and I am asking if you guys know if these brakes can be set up to stop the car pretty good?
Would it be unreasonable to expect them to be able to lock the tires and leave skid marks in the road?
I was (when younger) ASE certified in brakes, etc. I no longer need the certification (retired). That being said, I have a "test" question:I think you may have the positions of the shoes backwards.
Lockeed (Ford) fixed anchor brakes had the long shoe on the front and the short shoe to the rear. With these brakes, the front shoe does most of the work.
Bendex Self Eneggizing Brakes used the long shoe on the rear. The rear shoe does most of the work.
Chris
I was (when younger) ASE certified in brakes, etc. I no longer need the certification (retired). That being said, I have a "test" question:
As this type of brake system isn't truly self-energizing as the shoes are fixed in place (lower pins), what real difference does it make which shoe is front and which is placed to the rear?
I have a set of (I think) early 40's brakes and I am asking if you guys know if these brakes can be set up to stop the car pretty good?
Would it be unreasonable to expect them to be able to lock the tires and leave skid marks in the road?
Here's a pic of the left rear...
![]()
Thanks for all the replies. Now I know that they 'can', I've got to make to "DO".