1940 Sway Bar

v8fordman

Well-known member
I’m trying to educate myself. After looking for a sway bar for someone, I found two that were the same length but the swivel ends were different. Can anyone explain the difference and/or tell me if perhaps one was early and one was late. One takes a 3” shock link and the other takes what I have always considered the common 1940 swivel.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6660.jpg
    IMG_6660.jpg
    54.8 KB · Views: 224
  • IMG_6659.jpg
    IMG_6659.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 225
  • IMG_6658.jpg
    IMG_6658.jpg
    38.4 KB · Views: 227
I’m trying to educate myself. After looking for a sway bar for someone, I found two that were the same length but the swivel ends were different. Can anyone explain the difference and/or tell me if perhaps one was early and one was late. One takes a 3” shock link and the other takes what I have always considered the common 1940 swivel.
587698


587699


587700
 
If I remember correctly, Ford changed the sway bar design during 1940. There were two different styles. I have the swivel type or the one on the right side of your original photo. I can consult the 1940 Ford book. However, I bet Kube comes along pretty soon.....
 
I’m trying to educate myself. After looking for a sway bar for someone, I found two that were the same length but the swivel ends were different. Can anyone explain the difference and/or tell me if perhaps one was early and one was late. One takes a 3” shock link and the other takes what I have always considered the common 1940 swivel.
Those are both the same bars. One, the one with the shock links, appears to have been bent a little. The shock links do not belong there and never did. You have two "second & final design" bars.
 
Last edited:
My original objective was to educate myself. Now I am thoroughly confused. I have received communications concerning the statement that these sway bars were the same. I was told to (1)closely examine the brackets; especially the holes where they bolt to the frame. [One of the bars had gaskets on the bracket so I didn’t/couldn’t pay attention to the bracket holes]. (2)look for a difference in the size of the opening where the rubber bushing is exposed (3)notice the direction that the swivel studs are inserted indicating the taper would have to be on opposite sides of the sway bar (4) check the symmetry to see if the one is bent. I was also provided pictures from the May, 1940 Chassis Parts list which shows a totally different type of sway bar setup. I don’t have a 1940 vehicle, so none of this matters to me, but it may be helpful to someone trying to restore a car and runs into differences. I’ll let the pictures speak for themselves concerning whether these two bars are the same. After laying one bar on top of the other and then reversing ends, I determined neither was bent which understandably could be misdiagnosed by a picture.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6676.jpg
    IMG_6676.jpg
    34 KB · Views: 143
  • IMG_6677.jpg
    IMG_6677.jpg
    37.6 KB · Views: 142
  • IMG_6675.jpg
    IMG_6675.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 144
  • IMG_6674.jpg
    IMG_6674.jpg
    39.5 KB · Views: 146
My original objective was to educate myself. Now I am thoroughly confused. I have received communications concerning the statement that these sway bars were the same. I was told to (1)closely examine the brackets; especially the holes where they bolt to the frame. [One of the bars had gaskets on the bracket so I didn’t/couldn’t pay attention to the bracket holes]. (2)look for a difference in the size of the opening where the rubber bushing is exposed (3)notice the direction that the swivel studs are inserted indicating the taper would have to be on opposite sides of the sway bar (4) check the symmetry to see if the one is bent. I was also provided pictures from the May, 1940 Chassis Parts list which shows a totally different type of sway bar setup. I don’t have a 1940 vehicle, so none of this matters to me, but it may be helpful to someone trying to restore a car and runs into differences. I’ll let the pictures speak for themselves concerning whether these two bars are the same. After laying one bar on top of the other and then reversing ends, I determined neither was bent which understandably could be misdiagnosed by a picture.
587953


587954


587955


587956
 
The early 40 sway bar is much different than the later. Including the mounting brackets which drop the bar down (taller brackets) further than the later bar. I don't know the original purpose of the sway bar with the oval hole in the bracket and the shock links, both sway bars are of the basic later design of 40 but one may be post war??.
 
The photo showing the top of the brackets was not included in the original post.
I must ask, are they the same width? The photo makes it appear to me the bracket with the elongated hole is narrower. Yes? No?
 
The '40 Mercury frame is much different than the Ford. I suspect the sway bar was also different.
 
The bars are the same. Only the bracket is different. The 4 hole style is 1940 Ford and Mercury. The other bracket with an oval hole and 2 round holes is 1941 Ford and Mercury.
 
Back
Top