roccaas
Well-known member
He spent big bucks on the "X-8", but fought against the I6 for years. I've read this countless times, but never heard a reason why.
Chevy certainly made a mint on the Stovebolt.
Any multiple of the I6 (V12, I12) is a naturally balanced engine from an engineer's perspective. No balance shafts, smooth running, weight is generally low down in the engine. Just the sort of thing that Henry appreciated in an elegant design.
The Europeans certainly have produced some great I6's. I have one of them, and it is smooth and runs like a scalded dog.
I understand that racers are not so appreciative of the engine design as the crankshaft tends to develop a sine wave at higher revs.
Chevy certainly made a mint on the Stovebolt.
Any multiple of the I6 (V12, I12) is a naturally balanced engine from an engineer's perspective. No balance shafts, smooth running, weight is generally low down in the engine. Just the sort of thing that Henry appreciated in an elegant design.
The Europeans certainly have produced some great I6's. I have one of them, and it is smooth and runs like a scalded dog.
I understand that racers are not so appreciative of the engine design as the crankshaft tends to develop a sine wave at higher revs.