That article is contradicting stating negative camber. Still confused
Caster is a little less obvious. If you look at a bicycle from the side, the top of the spindle is angled rearward toward the rider. This is an extreme example of positive caster that creates high-speed stability-the effect that allows the rider to let go of the handlebars while the bike tracks straight.
Positive caster creates an aligning torque by positioning a portion of vehicle weight behind the tire, which helps position the tire straight ahead. It is this same torque that requires more effort to turn the whee.
The opposite situation is negative caster, where the top of the spindle is tilted forward past its vertical center-line.
This creates a grocery cart-like situation, where the wheel center-line is behind the spindle center-line. Negative caster reduces steering effort because the weight moves forward of the spindle vertical center but also detracts from high-speed stability.
Virtually all vehicles employ positive caster, but excessive amounts can lead to camber problems, since these two angles directly affect each other.
Thanks for the reply Kultulz but where I'm confused is most everything I read calls for negative camber and positive caster
Now I'm even more confused from your last article. I totally understand caster and camber. My concern was about the shop manual not stating + or - specs. This last article states - caster and + camber on older vehicles. I'm assuming my 56 Fairlane is considered to be older
Do cars have positive or negative caster?
Modern vehicles are provided with a positive caster angle while a negative caster was used in old vehicles.
According to the 1958 edition of Motor's Repair Manual, the specs are as follows:
caster : +1/2 to +1 1/2 desired: +1
camber: +1/4 to +1 1/4 desired: +3/4
toe-in :1/16 to 1/8
degrees toe-out on turnsuter wheel 20 , inner wheel 24 1/2
degrees steering axis : 7
These specs are the same for all models, hope this helps.