What Master Cylinder

Yes, I need to slow down and organize my thoughts when trying to get them in written form. I’m more of a verbal conversation kind of guy and I sometimes get frustrated by the amount of time required for written messages to go back and forth so I cram too much together. Although I have a lot of experience working on cars, and trucks, and Jeeps, I have not had a whole lot of experience on pre WW2 stuff. I am trying to get all this information down on paper so that I can build a notebook with it, I am old enough that my brain doesn’t seem to be able to keep quite so many balls in the air at the same time any more.

I think that when you corrected the typos on your drawing the drawing disappeared. It would be a big help if you would re-post that because I want to print it out. Thanks!
 
Good plan on putting it together in a notebook.

I see the drawing I posted fine. I'll send it to as a PM now.

Glenn
 
Does Cardone possibly make a remote reservoir conversion kit for the 1923? I have such a set up (in this case Willwood) on my Willys and it works quite well.
 
Does Cardone possibly make a remote reservoir conversion kit for the 1923? I have such a set up (in this case Willwood) on my Willys and it works quite well.

Not that I know of. These stepped bore MCs weren't widely multiple application used.

You mentioned that you picked up a " ... including the Boling Brothers battery box master cylinder set up (which I will not be using)"; you may want to take a look at using it along with a Mico Dual-bore (stepped) master cylinder that I mentioned with link in post #8 above. They also have boosted designs and remote reservoirs. You may want to give them a call.

https://www.mico.com/products/brake-actuation/master-cylinders/boosted-master-cylinders

Attached is an old Street Rodder magazine article and a Mico catalog that I trimmed and highlighted a little.

504146


Glenn
 

Attachments

I appreciate the information Glenn, I won’t be using the battery box because I have relocated the battery to the bed of the truck (in an old tool box)because I really disliked having it under the car. I can use the Cardone without a remote reservoir if necessary.
 
Read all the Mico stuff you sent, very informative! The Mico looks like a wonderful unit, my only concern being that it does not offer a split system to separate front and rear brakes.
 
I called MICO tech support, I was told that MICO makes nothing for an on highway application, turns out that article was written in 1974, neither of the 2 guys referenced in the article is still there, the part number in the article is obsolete. When I pushed the guy he was able to cross reference the old part number to a new one that has the same specs as the old one. He is sending me some drawings for me to look over.
 
Good on making the call. I attached their latest catalog above so the number should be listed there. Please post the drawings you get from them.

Glenn
 
If anybody wants to pm me with their email address I will forward the information that I got from MICO and then you could post it. BTW Glenn I have a different part number that has specs the same as the unit in the article (03-020-411) and would be better suited for our application as it has a smaller N bore. Anyway, all that aside, I do not see any advantage to the MICO when compared to the step bore Cardone. I don’t see any mechanical advantage to the MICO vs the Cardone. When you consider that that article was written in 1974, long before the step bore Cardone came along. I believe that essentially the Cardone is using the same technology, possibly they cloned the MICO.
 
Glenn, I’m sorry but I have not been able to see that last edited drawing that you posted. I believe that you posted it on here but I couldn’t see it, and you said that you sent it to me in a pm and I still couldn’t see it. It’s very strange and I can’t explain it but I have had it happen before. I really would like to get it so that I could print it out and put it in my notebook. I have been told not to post my email address on here because undesirables can get it. I will send my email address to you in a pm and hopefully you will be able to email it to me. Glenn, Coopeman, and the rest of you, you have been such a tremendous help to me, I can’t begin to express my thanks and appreciation.
 
Thanks Don,

These are the drawings, instructions, etc., that Don got from Mico. They recommended a large bore (N-1) of 1.50" and a small bore (N) of 0.875. It may be possible to use a remote fill with this master cylinder.

Glenn
 

Attachments

- Small size
- Advantages of a stepped bore, i.e., large volume at low foot force.
- Reduced pedal travel
 
I guess I should have been more clear, I meant as compared to the Cardone which I believe offers 2 of those advantages.
 
Resurrecting a very interesting thread for a similar question .

I have a 1932 ford roadster I inherited from my grandpa. It has the 38ish juice brakes in the front with 1.25x1 bore. In the back I replaced the 38ish brakes with bendix style brakes that have 1 inch more.

My MC is bolted to k member under floor and I think my pedal ratio is 4:1. My grandpa originally had a 1965ish single reservoir 1 inch bore master cylinder but I like the ideal of dual master.

I saw the suggestion for the 60s amc master cylinder but also glenns 10-1905 dual bore seems like it would work better for me?

Any thoughts on what’s best with this setup?
 
Back
Top