Bored&Stroked
Well-known member
Am I correct in assuming that you used the Red Line 75W140 NS GL-5 rather than the MT-90 75W90 GL-4 simply because you like the higher viscosity than is available in their Gl-4 products? (Red Line states that the NS GL-5 formulation can be used in vintage syncro transmissions.) According to Red Line, the MT-90 GL-4 is specifically intended for brass synchro transmissions.
I wanted a little higher viscosity - and as much shock/load proofing as I could get. Now that might be completely ridiculous (given the low HP levels of even the baddest flathead), but I figured I'd give it a try. Given this is the NS version, it should work out just fine.
I would probably not be running a synthetic oil on a stock 39 trans - as it would probably leak onto the floor at a high rate and is expensive to boot (that was my last experience!). BUT - because of the way I made the cluster and reverse shafts (with sealed caps on the ends) - and the way I sealed up the "shaft pin", it should not leak (and hasn't yet) - so why not try it.
Once it gets warmer, I'll be driving the car again and report back on shift quality during more extended usage. In my testing a couple weeks ago (low 40's temp - only about 10 miles of road testing) - the transmission shifted really well and didn't slip out of gear on high-revs and letting off the gas in 2nd (though this is due to how the trans is built - not the oil). So - I'm optimistic in general . . .
Note: They also mention that you can mix this with the 75W90 NS or MT-90 to "tune" the viscosity.
It would be interesting to see how well this works in a "regular" 39 box? I've not tried it . . . might leak like hell!