torque con. and flex plate

much better picture than mine. my ony reason for posting it was because I had never seen one like it. I am not going to be using it. I have a flat-o-matic kit in my car that adapts the Y-Block to a C-4
 
"How can I tell for sure if they have been previously milled or not and how much? is there any type of indicator to measure from?"

On the spark plug side of the heads are 2 square and 2 oblong pads. If the heads have never been milled they will measure exactly 1" high. A tape measure will give a rough idea but really isn't accurate enough for this, best to use a machinist's ruler or calipers.
 
Reviving an old thread regarding flex plates! I've removed the old thick heavy rivet flex plate per some of the recommendations here in favor of the new stamped one shown in the picture below. Can anyone offer some advice on which way it should be installed? I'm not sure on 4 things.

1. which direction the plate should face either relative to the engine (first or second picture?)
2. what the 3 spacers are for and how many to use? (are they to compensate for length of the 6 bolts to the crank?)
3. original plate was held on to the ring gear fly wheel by the 6 bolts and rivet wings (3 on each side 180 deg from each other) but this one looks like 4 bolts at 90 degrees from each other. so i should use the center holes from the original wings location at 3 oclock and 9 oclock and then use the existing nuts for 12 and 6 oclocks on the ring gear fly wheel? (3rd picture)
4. Are the 2 smaller bolts at 12 and 6 oclock on the fly wheel slightly closer to the center the drain bolts for the torque converter?


Thank you so much in advance for your help!
 

Attachments

  • flex plate_1.jpg
    flex plate_1.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 18
  • flex plate_2.jpg
    flex plate_2.jpg
    29.7 KB · Views: 18
  • flywheel_1.jpg
    flywheel_1.jpg
    56.4 KB · Views: 17
Reviving an old thread regarding flex plates!

I've removed the old thick heavy rivet flex plate per some of the recommendations here in favor of the new stamped one shown in the picture below.

Can anyone offer some advice on which way it should be installed?

Is there an original thread describing your situation and model?
 
I am not sure, but one reason they may have gone to the posted heads was because of the supercharged "F" engines. Non posted heads can be modified with posts.


For most usages, the un-posted heads are fine and had no inherent problems. In high performance modification situations the posted heads are better to use.
 
I am not sure, but one reason they may have gone to the posted heads was because of the supercharged "F" engines. Non posted heads can be modified with posts.

For most usages, the un-posted heads are fine and had no inherent problems. In high performance modification situations the posted heads are better to use.

FORD went to posted heads in MAY 1957 as they were having failures both on the street and track. I guess the E and F CODES put a stress on them.

What you very rarely find being discussed is the steam hammering in the head causing the deck to lift due to steam pockets being formed in the coolant jacket between the center cylinders as FORD (and CHEV) put two exhaust valves next to one another.
 

Attachments

  • CYL HEADS - Posted.jpg
    CYL HEADS - Posted.jpg
    35.5 KB · Views: 11
  • CYL HEAD - Posted.JPG
    CYL HEAD - Posted.JPG
    66 KB · Views: 16
Back
Top