Great discussion! As stated earlier, whether using a synthetic or mineral based oil, the additive packages included in the oil (about 25%-30% of the quart) get used up over time, and it depends significantly on the conditions under which the engine is operated. The additives in synthetics are chemically similar to those used in mineral oils, particularly in "branded" API-certified oils, but all are designed to perform their required function and eventually will be depleted. That being said, there are essentially 3 advantages synthetics have over mineral oils: 1. They are more thermally stable because of their synthesized same-size molecular structure. This translates to better high temperature properties leading to lower thermal and oxidative degradation than mineral oils under high engine temp conditions. Since lubricant decomposition and oxidation are precursors to thickening, varnish and eventually sludge, this is important regarding engine cleanliness. 2. Synthetics flow better at low temperatures than mineral oils, again because of their structured molecules. This is an advantage in very cold regions for easy starting and quick oil circulation. 3. Synthetics have low volatility and can directly affect oil consumption. To apply the above to our Model A engines we might consider the following: We tend to run our engines at relatively low crankcase temperatures, most of us don't bother to run our Model As when the ambient temperatures are below zero, and with a 500 mile oil change interval, oil volatility is a non-issue. There's no question that synthetics are superior oils, but considering the oils that were originally available to Henry when he was building these engines, any good (additized) mineral based oil will more than adequately do the job of keeping our engines clean, lubricated and cool. The choice really is personal.