I agree with #2,! Copper and spray the only way to go.I'm about to install a new head gasket using a mild high compression head. Has anyone had any experience using silicone head gaskets. What should be used as gasket sealer to assure no leaks. The head has just been resurfaced.
I'm about to install a new head gasket using a mild high compression head. Has anyone had any experience using silicone head gaskets. What should be used as gasket sealer to assure no leaks. The head has just been resurfaced.
As mentioned above, there are bad experiences with these gaskets however it is not the gasket's fault ...but instead is the mechanic. You cannot install these on surfaces with a rough finish. I have used these with great results. If your head and block decks have a RA finish of 50 or less, then these gasket seal well.
I was unaware of the requirements for finish quality, but it certainly makes sense. In my case it was a freshly decked head and a freshly stoned block but still leaked. Replaced with the copper-treated graphite and no issues.As mentioned above, there are bad experiences with these gaskets however it is not the gasket's fault ...but instead is the mechanic. You cannot install these on surfaces with a rough finish. I have used these with great results. If your head and block decks have a RA finish of 50 or less, then these gasket seal well.
I was unaware of the requirements for finish quality, but it certainly makes sense. In my case it was a freshly decked head and a freshly stoned block but still leaked. Replaced with the copper-treated graphite and no issues.
Jim Brierley makes a good point. If you use the copper spray on the graphite gasket it does stay tacky and is a bear to remove. I've had to pull heads twice after installing that way and the graphite gaskets split down the middle, had to scrape both the head and the block. Copper gasket is definitely easier to remove. On the other hand, hopefully when we install a head gasket it's for keeps.
Also, typically when Copper Coat must be used on a head gasket, it is band-aiding something. Prove me wrong on this.![]()
Glad to hear you had good luck with your installations. I however did not and it was not the mechanics fault.
I followed the directions, no sealer. Re-surfaced block and head. After 5k mi, I ended up with a combustion gasses in the cooling system and red silicone in the radiator.
I think we can all agree the failure rate is quite high with this gasket (Snyders Part #A-6051-M) and it is prudent to advise against the use of it.
You're not wrong but that perspective is not actionable. Almost every car has components that are not in ideal shape. Owners have to make careful decisions about which repairs should be done when and how. Knowing that, for example, a block has minor pitting and should ideally be surfaced does not commit me to having that done before I contemplate putting the car on the road. Sometimes a band-aid is the right treatment for the situation.
I'm not sure that anyone is criticizing the gasket - just reporting that experience with it (at least among those chiming in here) has generally been less than favorable. Clearly in order for it to work properly requires a set of bounding conditions of surface finish, and I'm not sure that has always been considered (I certainly didn't when I tried it). Replacing a head gasket when the block and head have not been decked as you describe - seems like the graphite gasket has a wider margin for imprecision in the surfacing. Having an engine out and in the milling machine for a complete rebuild is a bit different situation than replacing a gasket that has leaked on an otherwise adequately running engine in the car. I think we'd all like to have the opportunity to build an engine from the ground up to full tolerances but that opportunity doesn't always present itself.Colin, I don't disagree with you however maybe we could agree that when a component (-i.e.: Block deck or Cylinder Head deck) is not in ideal shape, criticizing a component that was not designed to function outside of that environment is kinda unfair. Suggesting that it has issues is much akin to spreading misinformation.
criticizing a component that was not designed to function outside of that environment is kinda unfair. Suggesting that it has issues is much akin to spreading misinformation.
That's interesting. I use it on a distributor with "modern" V-8 points and haven't noticed an issue. Why would it not work?I agree that this kind of nuance is important to share. I was recently in the position of defending the Nu-Wrench cam wrench on the grounds that it's only designed to work for stock upper plates, not plates adapted for V8 points.
That's interesting. I use it on a distributor with "modern" V-8 points and haven't noticed an issue. Why would it not work?