Shocks - reproduction vs. rebuilt

alexiskai said:
Not a great idea in terms of aesthetics, performance, or market value?
Click to expand...

Aesthetics, non-reversible. I would use a kit that had a bolt on/reversible mount, but not one that requires a visible hole/bolt. Different strokes for different folks.
 
Thanks for all the info.

We are not considering modern shocks right now, only rebuilds or reproductions. Also not going to drive it without them (not that I don't believe you, just a project management decision).

Here's what I've learned so far:
- Brentwood Bob is a good source for rebuilt shocks and has some right now
- There are two highly recommended reproductions, neither of which are available now

My question: Reproductions from Bratton's and Snyder's are available now and they claim to be lower maintenance than rebuilt. Has anyone used these specific shocks? How do they compare to high quality rebuilt shocks?
 
There were some past reproductions that didn't work out well for folks that put down good money for them. I'm sure that this has soured some folks from purchasing the sealed type shocks as well. They may work just fine but I can see why folks would hesitate. The Stipe shocks were actually built better than the old Houdallie types and they can be serviced and overhauled like the originals. The no maintenance shock can not be repaired if it goes south and that's the reason I shy away from them. There may be some folks that have purchased them but if they don't frequent the Ford Barn then the OP may never get a review on these types.
 
42horsepower said:
My question: Reproductions from Bratton's and Snyder's are available now and they claim to be lower maintenance than rebuilt. Has anyone used these specific shocks? How do they compare to high quality rebuilt shocks?
Click to expand...

My answer to your question(s) is just my opinion and does not reflect the workmanship of John Holland, Bob, Bryan Perkins, or any other rebuilder.

I have installed quite a few sets of shocks from Bill Stipe, Brattons, and Snyders ...and all of them seem to be holding up well. IMO, from a safety standpoint of adding and controlling stability during driving, stopping, and steering, any of these reproduction shocks are better than having nothing on the vehicle.

Now the one thing that you mentioned that may be 'perceived terminology' however from my vantage point, when someone uses the term "high quality rebuilt" it generally means that everything has been returned to tolerances or specifications equal to, -or better than factory new. Again, I am not belittling any rebuilder but in my mind unless that person brings all of the internal pieces back within factory specifications or tolerances, it begs the question in my mind of whether the item was actually rebuilt, -or repaired. I feel there is a difference.

With the above thoughts, from my own personal experiences, it is very time consuming to weld-up worn pieces and re-machine these to have the same tolerance as what that item did when new. For this reason alone, most rebuilders cannot spend the needed time to completely restore a shock and come out financially. Therefore, it has been my experience that this person typically finds something that is repairable and do the best with what they have to work with. I have no problem with that, and there is a definite need for that in our hobby. The unfortunate thing about this method however, it really is not comparing apples-to-apples when those repaired shocks are compared to a brand new, freshly machined piece that has everything in proper tolerance.

Just my 2¢...
 
Rebuilding old shocks…something I used to do.
As above stated by Brent…
It is impossible (or near)) to find decent cores anymore.
There are 13 wear points inside a shock. Each surface is mutually dependent on the other surfaces. To weld and/or machine down 13 surfaces is really cost-prohibitive. And nigh impossible to get good tolerances back.
If one finds a “decent” shock with minimal wear, heavier viscosity fluid may be added. However, the shock action will not be exactly as original and cold weather might play havoc.
 
thank you for that description Brent. Yes that makes total sense.

when you think of the wear and tear a shock receives, unless it came from a low mileage car, it almost doesnt make sense to rebuild them. Most are worn out.
 
ronn said:
thank you for that description Brent. Yes that makes total sense.

when you think of the wear and tear a shock receives, unless it came from a low mileage car, it almost doesnt make sense to rebuild them. Most are worn out.
Click to expand...

I agree. I think for the present time, you are spot-on.

One thing I will say that may throw all of this out is that I think in the future there may be a new option for hobbyists. My shop has been trying to purchase a CNC machining center to use for various tasks around the shop. I think in the near future, the possibility is very real to fixture and set-up a worn, used shock that could be computer machined to an oversized tolerance in the wear areas ...all with exacting precision. Then the rotor can have the wear surfaces welded and then re-machined to fit the oversized re-machined shock body. While the costs may never be as affordable as what reproduction units are now, it gives a viable option for rebuilding original shocks and making them nearly equal to the reproduction units.
 
I made clamp on brackets to clamp over the front axle rather than drill a hole.I also lowered the shocks to work better.
2rVL4uhm.jpg
.
rixVm8Em.jpg
VcCE06Mm.jpg
j1S2hoIm.jpg
eHYBW8gm.jpg
 
Last edited:
Steve, was this install an improvement?
You would not believe the effort it takes to find usable OEM shocks, and then fix them.
For me, real satisfaction comes when the reworked, correct set get matched to a model a.
 
FWIW, I'd like to report that I have two sets I obtained from Brentwood Bob...both sets were properly matched and worked perfectly.

As for availability of rebuildable cores, I had a boxful I sent out to Bob as part of a trade deal on a separate project he was doing for me...they all looked OK from the outside but it seems that only a couple out of the 10 or so I sent were usable cores. All had been off of cars for some time. I think the comments made by others about the difficulty of obtaining rebuildable cores is certainly true.

Buying a rebuilt set is expensive, but original shocks are only going to cost more as time marches on...I'd recommend folks consider saving up and buying a set while some are still available...I suspect reproductions when they become available again will set a new high price record.
 
Brentwood Bob said:
Steve, was this install an improvement?
You would not believe the effort it takes to find usable OEM shocks, and then fix them.
For me, real satisfaction comes when the reworked, correct set get matched to a model a.
Click to expand...
They helped as there were none on the car ,at $395 for the kit it was not to bad.I had a power saw ,drill press and a wire welder already.My dad had a small machine shop in the back of his 30' x 40' garage.I grew up with that and took a two year machine shop class in High School at a vo-tech school then a four year apprentice class at night working in a shop in the daytime, my company would pay for it if you kept passing grades.
 
Brentwood Bob,
I have a set of cores that I think would be rebuildable, but not certain. I'm sure you know what to look for. If you're interested in buying them, PM me for more info.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top