BRENT in 10-uh-C
Well-known member
So that we do not use opinion to skew the facts, when you compare much that was written in Foreman's Logs, Engineering Releases, M-Specs, internal Sales materials et/al, it becomes clear that Ford manufactured his own paints at that time, --and to exacting standards. There just wasn't variations when comparing vehicles coming from different Branches.
Also, so that we are clear, Ford did not "use-up" excess product or materials, as EVERYTHING was produced on work orders giving specific quantities and timelines for production on each and every part. If you take the time to study the methods they used, contrary to popular wives' tales, this theory of using up excess inventory is not factual.
Now when you study some of the history, you find there is some production overlap due to logistics such as transportation and such, but Ford marketing introduced each new model year with a new set of colors, ...and when the model year was introduced, the Branches were instructed to begin using the new color.
Now with all of the above said, Steve it is VERY, V E R Y unlikely that your Roadster was painted in Ford Maroon as that was only optioned out as a special order car. Ford Maroon was a color reserved for Deluxe closed cars, and only the Convertible Sedan was given the option of a variation of the Ford Maroon. When you look at Thorne, you will see some hues of red so I would guess you are actually seeing Thorne in the hidden areas.. As others have mentioned, it is your car so do what pleases you however I am finding in our evermore 'politically correct' society, proper colors are important to buyers seeking higher-level vehicles when higher prices are expected.
