We went thru that phase in life where we switched to powder-painting undercarriage pieces on vehicles we were restoring. We first used the Eastwood gun, and we used both their powder, and we used Tiger-Drylac's powders.
FWIW, when I have gone back and looked at the powder painted vehicles we restored back 15+ years ago, and compared it to pieces we painted with catalyzed PPG Concept (DCC9300, DCC9700, & DCC9000) around, -or just before that time, the sprayed liquid paints have held their sheen and color fastness better than the powder-painted pieces have. With rare exception, we have not powderpainted anything for a restoration in the last decade or so. My recommendations are that most powders are about ½-step above a Krylon rattle can paintjob.
So to answer your question, basically the Eastwood gun has a long metal rod that uses a pressurized cup to blow powder up into a diffuser where that powder is statically charged by the current flowing by the metal rod. If the humidity is great, it doesn't charge the powder enough to make it cling to the item you are applying the powder to. The reverse happens if the humidity is too low. This is all controlled better when in an assembly line oven where the powder can first be fluidized, and then the metal object can be preheated. All of this is really beyond the capability of most home users.
Below are a few of the items we made for us to do this years ago...
.
.