Pat Martone
Senior Member
I know this has been discussed many times, but I am still confused on which is better, original or modern points/condenser.
(Also, for some reason I cannot get the Search function to work this morning on fordbarn, when I tried to research previous posts on this subject.)
While many people feel that the original points/condenser set-up is best, Les Andrews' book indicates many benefits of modern points/condenser including:
- they last longer due to nylon instead of fiber rubbing contact with the cam, and,
- the higher mounted condenser (in the upper instead of the lower plate) is less likely to suffer from excess engine heat.
(BTW - I understand that A&L Parts makes a burn-out proof original type condenser.)
Is it simply a matter of choice, or does one set-up provide a more reliable and better performing engine?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
(Also, for some reason I cannot get the Search function to work this morning on fordbarn, when I tried to research previous posts on this subject.)
While many people feel that the original points/condenser set-up is best, Les Andrews' book indicates many benefits of modern points/condenser including:
- they last longer due to nylon instead of fiber rubbing contact with the cam, and,
- the higher mounted condenser (in the upper instead of the lower plate) is less likely to suffer from excess engine heat.
(BTW - I understand that A&L Parts makes a burn-out proof original type condenser.)
Is it simply a matter of choice, or does one set-up provide a more reliable and better performing engine?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.