I'm sorry but I have to finally chime in one this one. There have been lots of threads on fine point judging and I just kept my mouth shut but this one is over the top. Come on, really? You paint the edge of the copper gasket white to mimic something that isn't made anymore just so it can pass fine point judging? And where is the "fine" in the judging if you can pass that the car left the factory with white paint on the edge of the head gasket? That is like those fake battery cases, repop T3 headlights (for later cars).... Face the facts that you can't reproduce how the cars left the factory perfectly because the consumable parts will have deteriorated and perfect replacements aren't available. Its one thing to have an accurate historical record, its another to "repaint" history.
Everything else gets repainted, so what's the problem?
p.s. I brought three NORS white asbestos head gaskets to the swap at Oshkosh to sell, and no one even asked the price. They are not hard to find.
Occasionally judges may have used their technical knowledge of specific items that were not included in the Standards available at the time. Individual judges must not use their own ideas, interpretations and/or opinions as this puts the owner at a great disadvantage when his vehicle is judged against information not in the Standards. This practice shall be discontinued. A restorer from one part of the country can enter his Model A in other locations secure in the knowledge that his vehicle will be consistently evaluated. The measure of a restorers efforts shall be evaluated against the Standards and nothing more.
Bob
I'm confused. "If a reproduction part is such that it is indistinguishable from the original, it too shall merit full points." If it's indistinguishable from an original wouldn't it receive full points anyway? Is this in the JS's for consumable items assuming they couldn't possibly be NOS therefore must be reproduction?