How about the myth that if pistons are installed with the ring gaps all in line the engine will not start due to lack of compression or it will burn copious amounts of oil, etc., etc. Not so!............ ....Some math: A piston's ring land diameter is approx. .030"-.060" smaller than the cylinder diameter so let's say we have .030" space between piston and cylinder wall above the ring gap and a .020" ring gap. That is an area of .0006" sq. in. exposed to compression pressure. Whatever compression gets through that tiny gap has to begin pressurizing the space between the top and 2nd ring before it will escape through the 2nd ring gap. This space is comparatively large and any compression pressure can easily find the 2nd ring gap no matter whwere it is. Likewise with the top rail of the oil ring, no matter where that gap is located. Rings do rotate in their grooves so who knows how often the gaps all line up in an engine's lifetime?![/QUOTE
If the ring gaps are aligned it wouldn't lose enough compression to keep it from cranking but it certainly wouldn't be a good thing.The rings fit tightly to the cylinder walls. A .020 ring gap is a .020 ring gap and the width of the piston ring land diameter doesn't change ring end gap. All of the new ring sets that I have ever seen or used stressed the fact to stagger the ring gaps. If the ring manufacturer didn't think that staggering the ring gaps made a difference they wouldn't recommend staggering them. I have no doubt that the rings will rotate in the grooves. Will lined up end gaps cause oil burning, I haven't tried it. I know that I wouldn't try it.