New web site and free catalogs

This must be a joke. I just tried the site again. I could not open a single thing- double click, right hand click, reloaded and nothing worked. Why would someone have a web page that nobody can use except a few?
 
Sorry about the trouble I am going to have to change it.
Can anyone out there point me in the right direction as to a fairly easy to use website creating program?

Thanks

Bill
 
Using IE, the site naviagation buttons seem strange. The top half of the buttons don't work but the bottom half of the buttons work fine. As long as I only click on the bottom half of the navigation buttons, the site works fine for me.

If you want to set up a site with some less than wonderful but easy to use with limited technical knowledge software, Godaddy's Website Tonight software is easy to use. It is not as functional as some other software, but easy to get a site up and running with no experience. I use it on the two websites that I run.
 
Yes, there are some bugs to work out. This is just a trial site to get the info out there until a better one can be created. The site works if you open it using Internet Explorer.
 
Bill, welcome to the wonderful world of creating a website! Firefox did not display much, but IE 8 did work fine. As far as it not working on other browsers, I am guessing that Microsoft didn't validate (or attempt) operation with other web browsers. I've been using the web development tool provided by Yahoo for my clubs website and although not real flashy, does seem to work across the different web browsers. Harry K, webmaster, vice president www.foxvalleymarc.com
 
IE is loosing market share at a fast rate. Firefox & Google Chrome has taken over and I even suspect FF will be the next IE in terms of market share loss.

IE has tons of security issues, and is slow compared to others. I use Firefox and Chrome and haven't used IE in a few years now.

Check out this link, it's rather interesting! It may give you some ideas on how to build your new site based on browser popularity.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
 
Mike V. Florida said:
Actually it's the hosting site that has the "problem" they need to support Microsoft code.
Click to expand...

To my knowledge that would not make any difference. Microsoft based servers and Unix based servers (or variants) have different conventions and limitations for sure. However the code in Bill's pages is all client side code, i.e., decoded by your browser software. Nothing is "server side" and decoded or processed on request. If it were an incompatible server issue it would not display on IE (your "client" software) either.
 
Mike V. Florida said:
Actually it's the hosting site that has the "problem" they need to support Microsoft code.
Click to expand...
No, this has nothing to do with the hosting site. It is strictly a function of what was prepared to define the page. The hosting site only stores and returns to the user's browser what the original page creator made. It is the browser that will or will not present the proper image to the user.

Micro$oft is notorious for ignoring industry standards and going off and producing "stuff" that only operates in a Micro$oft world. True from the very beginning of the company. The attitude is "We're Micro$oft, we will tell YOU what the standard is!".

Publisher is probably the worst of the lot. Will not interoperate with anything, even other Micro$oft products in many cases.

An alternative that is likely not palatable to most is to learn how HTML and CSS works and code the page itself instead of using a high order tool. (Gotta' be a bit of a geek to do this! :D )
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top