Our coupe had a modern starter bendix. The teeth on the ring gear were not being fully engaged and were worn beveled??? I put on a new ring gear and original style bendix when I replaced the clutch disk.
The modern bendix was loud and seemed violent. The original is quiet.
I just went through all this. Too many stories about the modern one chewing up flywheels
and not engaging properly. And besides that, I like crank starting the car now and then.
It's fun for me. At car shows I sometimes do it to show people how motoring was 90 years ago!
Why or how does the modern style bendix drive prevent you from hand cranking the engine to start it?
I don't really know how they work.
Bob Bidonde,
Can you give an estimate of the number of miles you are driving the cars that have the modern bendix? Synchro and I both drive a lot of miles. Our car had the new bendix, it had not failed to start the car, but the flywheel was chewed badly. The modern bendix had about 17000 miles on it that we put on in 3 years time.
I've read where it would require approx. .150 thickness in shims to engage the teeth properly, and that the shaft has additional distance clearance for the gear to gain speed and momentum.
I'm gonna see if I can get my endoscope into the clutch housing far enough to see the old style bendix to any advantage. Otherwise, I'll probably remove the starter every 5000 miles or so to inspect. Could clean the flanges for good grounding at the same time.
Does the small gear of the modern bendix stay engaged with the ring gear all the time that the engine is running?
Or does it pull back away from the ring gear once the engine is running?
Where would these shims go? Where the starter motor mounts?
Our coupe had a modern starter bendix. The teeth on the ring gear were not being fully engaged and were worn beveled???
Bob Bidonde,
I've read where it would require approx. .150 thickness in shims to engage the teeth properly, and that the shaft has additional distance clearance for the gear to gain speed and momentum.