I have a 28 PU I am working on. This was a basket case I bought back in the 60's. The rear of the transmission is low enough to hit the brake cross shaft when the cross shaft is actuated.
The front cross member has been replaced at some point with a very early 28 with the rigid mount style. The rigid mount part has been flame cut off and a later spring suspended front mount installed using the early 28 cross member and putting a hole in the bottom for the engine mount.
The crank handle busing is level with the engine crank center line so it looks like the elevation of the front of the engine is correct to the front cross member. However, the radiator if placed on the original mounting holes places the radiator too close to the fan.
The rear mounts are about 3/8" below the top of the frame and look to be reasonable as far as not being bent down or anything.
The rear of the transmission and the torque tube actually hit the brake cross shaft. The brake cross shaft bearings and bearing mounts look fine. Seems the engine is at the wrong angle for some reason.
As the front mount has been replaced with an early 28 rigid type and modified to use the later spring engine mount, I am wondering if the overall elevation of the early front cross member is different from the later ones.
Something has the engine too low in the back. Never run into this before. Front or back is wrong. Back needs to come up about 1/2 " or so to clear the cross shaft.
Any comments welcome.
gacannon
The front cross member has been replaced at some point with a very early 28 with the rigid mount style. The rigid mount part has been flame cut off and a later spring suspended front mount installed using the early 28 cross member and putting a hole in the bottom for the engine mount.
The crank handle busing is level with the engine crank center line so it looks like the elevation of the front of the engine is correct to the front cross member. However, the radiator if placed on the original mounting holes places the radiator too close to the fan.
The rear mounts are about 3/8" below the top of the frame and look to be reasonable as far as not being bent down or anything.
The rear of the transmission and the torque tube actually hit the brake cross shaft. The brake cross shaft bearings and bearing mounts look fine. Seems the engine is at the wrong angle for some reason.
As the front mount has been replaced with an early 28 rigid type and modified to use the later spring engine mount, I am wondering if the overall elevation of the early front cross member is different from the later ones.
Something has the engine too low in the back. Never run into this before. Front or back is wrong. Back needs to come up about 1/2 " or so to clear the cross shaft.
Any comments welcome.
gacannon