Railcarmover
BANNED
What is the modification? Bore it out some?
What is the modification? Bore it out some?
Thanks Pete,going to give one a shot.A fella on here claims it helps with a cam thrust issue too.It makes sense,it should.
Brent, Some of the OHV's had very high compression, most did not. The last of the aluminum Riley 4-ports were 10:1, Cooks and other racing OHV's were only 6.5 or 7:1 high for the day but considered low today. The diesel conversion that I am aware of was built by a trade-school teacher in L.A. It was an F-head design, OHV on the intakes, exh still in the block. Yes it was very high compression, necessary to ignite diesel fuel. Story goes something happened to the B engine he was running, so he hurriedly built an A block for it for his honeymoon. It worked well for that trip. I once had a set of B rods that he had supposedly built for the diesel, they were double I-beam rods, 2 stock rods welded together, 4 bolts, extremely heavy. I thought too heavy for racing, so sold them to a friend. That friend raced them at Bonneville, and one broke! There was a reinforcing rod in the middle of them! Yes, we are still friends!
There are a couple ways to do it.
.....Bore it and make a split sleeve.
.....Bore it bigger. Sleeve it.
.....Broach a new keyway.
...or just mount it inside the flywheel!
Adding it to the flywheel does nothing to mitigate crankshaft torsional deflections!
Brent, mounting a torsional damper on the flywheel end of the crankshaft will make for a smoother running engine, however, it does nothing to minimize crankshaft torsional deflections, and it does nothing to minimize harmonics.
Look at any modern engine designed by engineers and please find one that has a torsional damper mounted on the flywheel end of the crankshaft instead of at the front of the crankshaft, and post your findings here for all to read.
Brent, mounting a torsional damper on the flywheel end of the crankshaft will make for a smoother running engine, however, it does nothing to minimize crankshaft torsional deflections, and it does nothing to minimize harmonics.
Look at any modern engine designed by engineers and please find one that has a torsional damper mounted on the flywheel end of the crankshaft instead of at the front of the crankshaft, and post your findings here for all to read.
Just a side note on the "crankshaft torsional deflections" that Terry mentions here: These deflections are large enough to be easily measured. In fact, every modern vehicle has such a device. It's called a "crankshaft position sensor", and one of its functions is to detect any misfire. It measures this crankshaft deflection every power stroke. If the cylinder doesn't fire, there is no deflection and the ECM records this. After a certain number of misfires in a given time frame, the ECM sets a code and begins flashing the "check Engine" light. The code will indicate which cylinder is misfiring (P0301, P0305), etc.) unless it's a random, multiple cylinder misfire (P0300). Interestingly, in the early days of electronic engine control, driving on a washboard road would rattle the crankshaft enough to upset the ECM and it would set a misfire code!
The closest thing to a 'harmonic balancer' flywheel is a flex plate/torque converter on an automatic transmission,it provides centrifugal and well as some fore and aft dampening.
No it doesnt,the crankshaft position sensor works on hall effect,the passing of a steel reluctor wheel or tone ring (it has teeth,not unlike a gear) above a magnetic pickup.As the crankshaft spins the teeth/space coupled with the magnet makes an impulse,the impulse is read by the ECM.
https://www.samarins.com/glossary/crank_sensor.html