Do they not use progressive linkage?Most claim that 2x2 run the best. They also have the advantage of easier to tune and easy linkage. The 3x2 setups look cooler (IMO), but are more difficult to tune and the linkage can be more of an issue. I like the 3x2s myself!Was never into easy!!!
Do they not use progressive linkage?
I think you need to read John Lawson's Book "Flathead facts". He covers this topic, including Dyno results. Also remember the stock ignition will not work with these modification. You can get the book from Max VP
Here is probably the definitive article on the subject : https://www.hotrod.com/articles/hrdp-1301-flathead-ford-intake-manifold-smackdown/.
Also, you must change the distributor from stock when going to multiple carbs on a late flathead if you want it to run properly. The stock distributor on a late model flathead is very specialized unit (called a "Load-a-Matic") that will work correctly only when combined with a single stock carburetor. There is a thread below titled "Vacume (sic) source" that goes into this in depth.
This was my thinking. 3x2 Looks cooler, costs more and harder to work on of course.Most claim that 2x2 run the best. They also have the advantage of easier to tune and easy linkage. The 3x2 setups look cooler (IMO), but are more difficult to tune and the linkage can be more of an issue. I like the 3x2s myself!Was never into easy!!!