KR Wilson Shock Tester

I used to have to test the who die dampers on the Bell 47 stabilizer bars. They had a test arm and a place to attach a weight. We would time them from full up to full down. They were a much newer design that used a screw type needle valve to adjust the rate and had a glass window to see the oil level and condition. They used MIL-H-5606 hydraulic oil on those. Houd Engineering made this stuff well up into the 1970s. The old Ford automotive types used the dog leg arm in order to fit in situ to make checkups easy for mechanics. There is a lot of info in the Service bulletins. The final service info published begins on page 536. The main thing is that the arm length and weight is the same whether is has a dog leg shape or not. It works either way but the dog leg works well on the car.

I used to do weight & balance on aircraft a lot after modifications. Weight X the arm give the turning moment for calculations. The arm on those tools is substantial and the weight is fairly hefty but not too big. They give the amount of seconds for timing the damper movement in that service instruction for nominal weather and for cold weather. I'd say that is could vary some but all should be about the same per the application such as front or rear. Most automobile shocks have a fair amount of resistance to movement otherwise they don't dampen the spring action very well.
 
Last edited:
The original glycerine with 10% alcohol mix first used in Model A shocks was equivalent to SAE 80wt. Ford tested and released different oils in the next 10 years, ranging from equivalent 20 wt to 70 wt. The 600W oil sold by Snyders is equivalent to about 80 wt. Multi-viscosity oils may help somewhat and 85-140 makes sense for shocks with more wear.

As a test Kurt, your shock, when adjusted to max resistance, should take minutes to actual "hold" when testing the arc.
 
Paul Shinn video taped my seminar at the MAFCA national meet in Pendleton, OR on how to create an accurate DIY shock tester. This was based on my many years of testing with the original KR Wilson bench tester.

I have worked out the precise torque-value math and correlated it to useable, soft-to-firm settings (from seconds-drop resistance data), compared with a KR Wilson tool. Please note that temperature at testing is very sensitive to the change in resistance.

My DIY shock tester provides an very accurate way to equalize shock absorber resistance settings. I am sure that Paul Shinn will make this video available in the near future.

And yes Bob, this is much better than a Crescent wrench!

Here's a link to the video of Steve giving the shock absorber talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XewC7i3toY

My apologies if this is a duplicate.
 
It was unclear to me whether the 16.75 lb weight he described included the weight of the hook and washer used to attach the weight to the shock arm.
 
Steve, excellent presentation. Thank you so much.
Is there any way we could get a copy of the Handout you passed out at your seminar? Maybe upload it here?
Also, how do I order a book of yours?

Lastly, I am interested in building (recreating) the KR Wilson testing apparatus you demonstrated. Could you provide measurements and weights and angles?
I love your solution with the four boat-anchors. I tried it. Worked great. It is my new standard, because I do not have the experience John Holland has in my arm with a crescent wrench.

You have really modernized the approach to the Ford Model A original shocks.

Thanks.

Diastole in the Smokies
 
The instructions I got with my Stipe Shocks says to use Full Synthetic 30-40 weight Hydraulic oil. Would that be the same a 30-40 weight engine oil? If not, where do I find 30-40 weight hydraulic oil.

Never mind, found what I needed.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top