No, it is not.
Start here for a good compilation of work done on spark knock:
https://saemobilus.sae.org/articles/knock-a-century-research-03-15-01-0004
Most research is done on test engines at Wide Open Throttle (WOT). Most of us do not drive our Model A at WOT. So you have to be careful about translating the test results to your everyday driver.
When thinking about ignition timing, you need to consider flame front speed, which is a function of several things (compression ratio [CR], temperature, pressure [both impacted by CR], Air-Fuel Ratio [mixture], fuel being used, cylinder head design, and probably a few things I am forgetting because I'm doing this from memory). Directionally how each of these affects flame speed is known. For example, a lean mixture burns much faster than a rich one. Hot air-fuel mixtures tend to burn faster than cool ones. There is thermodynamics behind this.
Flame front speed dictates how soon before TDC you want to fire the spark plug, in milliseconds (
ms).
Depending on RPM, the number of degrees of crankshaft rotation that those ms represent gets larger and larger at higher and higher RPM. You can sit down and do some basic dimensional analysis and back into that. So even if the flame front speed did not change, the
degrees before TDC that you want your spark to fire will increase with increasing RPM. But the flame front speed DOES change, as various conditions change, so it is not just about RPM.
You want peak combustion pressure a few degrees after TDC. To get that, you have to start the flame front with a spark some time (
ms) before that. There is a delay until the flame front really gets going. That time combined with RPM converts to degrees BTDC. The flame front speed is not fixed, it varies (see above). In conditions that give a very fast flame front speed, you do not want to have the spark too early or you will hit peak pressure too soon. But if your flame front is slower, then you do want to advance the spark timing more, to get peak pressure at the optimum point in piston/crank position (not too late).
The attached advance curves include the stock Model B, which illustrates the point. This curve was determined empirically by Ford engineers in the lab and on the road, based on previous experience and an understanding of the basics. It is not ideal, it is an acceptable engineering solution.
Prior to THIS engineering solution, Ford's solution for the Model A was "TDC to start the engine, part way down once it starts (so fixed, not varying with RPM) and then advance it some more at higher RPM (again, fixed at the new, more advanced, position -- not varying with RPM). Instead of the Model B line, you get a Model A stair-step with a couple of flat spots. An engineering approximation that is "good enough". Of course, the stock compression head is very forgiving to having the timing be not quite optimum. Higher compression heads a little less so. But 6.0:1 compression ratio is not really "high".
Sorry this is so long. I hope it helps.