Mart
Well-known member
I will try that making sure the end of the zerk does not pass the inside surface of the clam.
Yeah, you might have to file a little bit off the end of the fitting.
Mart.
I will try that making sure the end of the zerk does not pass the inside surface of the clam.
Does anyone know what they did back in the day? These cars did not just roll off the assembly line. There must have been a solution when they were common.
My thinking is that when the ****** mount is new it holds the clam up high enough to get the grease gun on the zerk but over time it may compress just enough to lower the clam zerk down too close to the frame. Mine ****** mount was new 50,000 miles and 4½ years ago so maybe it's worn down over that time. I don't know. I've ordered a new one and when it comes I'll compare both carefully to see what differences if any. If they're identical I'll know that's not the correct answer.
Did you try jacking up the rear of the transmission a bit?
I'm not familiar with the clamshell on a closed drive, but perhaps you could flip it so the grease fitting is on the top instead of the bottom?
Is it my imagination or an optical illusion or is the ****** shifted to the passenger side.
If shifted maybe a slight nudge with a pry bar would give enough clearance to access the fitting.
Why do you grease it every 1000 miles? Is it leaking out? Once filled, it should last a long time.
Once greased with a low drop point grease it will be years before it will need it again. G.M.
Oh Old Henry I did not put two and two together until just now. I know more about pre war than post war-but isn't the universal joint in the clam shell? If so we are into the dreaded what type of grease to use when greasing. STP mixed with wheel bearing grease, wheel bearing grease, 10,000 weight motor oil or the John Deer corn head grease.