how did it cool?
SofaKing;1155961 A real weak spot is the crankshaft when a car engine is installed in an aircraft. Car engine cranks not designed for propeller loads said:It's clearly evident in the photo that the propeller is NOT attached to the crankshaft. The crank drives a reduction-type gearbox, as do most experimentals with auto engines. In fact, many production aircraft engines are "geared", or drive the prop through a reduction-type gearbox. The propeller loads are on the gearbox.......not the crankshaft flange. DD
![]()
It's clearly evident in the photo that the propeller is NOT attached to the crankshaft. The crank drives a reduction-type gearbox, as do most experimentals with auto engines. In fact, many production aircraft engines are "geared", or drive the prop through a reduction-type gearbox. The propeller loads are on the gearbox.......not the crankshaft flange. DD
![]()
The bellhousing end of the engine is the front of the engine and at most is resting on the forward engine mount, not 'hung' on anything. The rear (water pump end ) of the engine is mounted on the engine cradle.I wonder though, when many people on this forum would not hang the weight of the engine from the cast bellhousing for fear of it cracking; how many would hang the weight of the engine, aircraft, fuel and themselves from that same cast bellhousing? Still it is an interesting mechanical exercise and shows the determination to get airborne. Probably sound real nice on take-off too.
The bellhousing end of the engine is the front of the engine and at most is resting on the forward engine mount, not 'hung' on anything. The rear (water pump end ) of the engine is mounted on the engine cradle.
I think he's referring to " Hanging it on the prop" where all the weights are hanging on the prop in a steep climb.
Bill