OhioRick
Senior Member
I recently pulled the pan on my 1940 59A flathead chasing a broken ring. The engine is rebuilt now with 2500 miles on it. Found the culprit to my 30 pounds pressure in the no 7 cylinder. Luckily there was no damage to the cylinder walls only the ring grooves.
But upon inspection of the lower end I found the No 8 connecting rod loose at the journal with a backed off castelated nut and a broken cotter key.
I also pulled off the adjacent No 4 connecting cap.
Both of the bearings were broken. I found the rod bearing surfaces only had very very minimal damage at the edge and no damage whatsoever on the crank journal. Am I lucky or what??
I have no idea how this happened. I can only guess the rear crank journal was over machined and they installed undersize bearings.
Now the specs and measurements. I am a metrologist and had my way around machining.
Stock specs and sizes...
Stock rod bore- forging number 99A and 29A size 2.3597 / 2.3600
Stock floating bearing size .1095
Stock Crank journal size 2.138 /2.139
My engine component measurements...
Rod bore 2.363 only about .001 out of round
Crank rod journal size 2.115 only at .0015 out of round
Now if
2.3600 - 2.1390 = .221 at the stock tolerance.
Then my engine measurements of
2.363 - 2.115 = .248 at present tolerance.
Those numbers of .248 - .221 = .027 oversize
Am I correct in assuming I can use a .030 oversize bearing????
Ha didnt know you guys were going to get a math quiz.
I am assuming that this must be a later model 59A
Rick
.
But upon inspection of the lower end I found the No 8 connecting rod loose at the journal with a backed off castelated nut and a broken cotter key.
Both of the bearings were broken. I found the rod bearing surfaces only had very very minimal damage at the edge and no damage whatsoever on the crank journal. Am I lucky or what??
I have no idea how this happened. I can only guess the rear crank journal was over machined and they installed undersize bearings.
Now the specs and measurements. I am a metrologist and had my way around machining.
Stock specs and sizes...
Stock rod bore- forging number 99A and 29A size 2.3597 / 2.3600
Stock floating bearing size .1095
Stock Crank journal size 2.138 /2.139
My engine component measurements...
Rod bore 2.363 only about .001 out of round
Crank rod journal size 2.115 only at .0015 out of round
Now if
2.3600 - 2.1390 = .221 at the stock tolerance.
Then my engine measurements of
2.363 - 2.115 = .248 at present tolerance.
Those numbers of .248 - .221 = .027 oversize
Am I correct in assuming I can use a .030 oversize bearing????
Ha didnt know you guys were going to get a math quiz.
I am assuming that this must be a later model 59A
Rick
.
Attachments
Last edited: