Shadetree
Well-known member
I remember in high school my science teacher discussed the difference between an engine and a motor about 60 years ago. An engine develops power directly from a fuel. A motor relies on another source of power to operate, as an electric motor. This is one of very few things I retained because I was fascinated with anything mechanical, still that way today. I stand mesmerized and watch a big, running hit and miss engine until my wife nudges me and says let’s move on.
I Googled and found this:
This is close to what my science teacher said.
But on the other hand we have motorcycles, motor bikes, motor scooters and motor boats which have engines. We have jet engines, rocket engines, airplane engines and steam engines.
I was surprised how much written about this on the Internet. I like this quote but it still doesn’t help much:
`In a strictly physics sense an engine converts energy into mechanical work.
A motor is a subset of engines that produce motion as the mechanical work.
So all motors are engines but not all engines are motors.’
Thoroughly confused by now? So am I!
Shadetree
I Googled and found this:
* A motor converts electricity or other forms of kinetic energy into a mechanical motion *
* An engine is a mechanical device that uses a fuel source to create an output *
This is close to what my science teacher said.
But on the other hand we have motorcycles, motor bikes, motor scooters and motor boats which have engines. We have jet engines, rocket engines, airplane engines and steam engines.
I was surprised how much written about this on the Internet. I like this quote but it still doesn’t help much:
`In a strictly physics sense an engine converts energy into mechanical work.
A motor is a subset of engines that produce motion as the mechanical work.
So all motors are engines but not all engines are motors.’
Thoroughly confused by now? So am I!
Shadetree
Last edited: