Interesting, throwing away something that's still doing it's job. Here's an oil story that I'll swear on my 41 Packard 160 is dead-on-balls true. I drag raced in the 90s. I ran a 454 punched .100 over with a .714 roller cam and 14.11:1 compression. In the begining I ran Kendall "Nitro 50" on the recommendations of some of the top engine builders here near Motown. The car ran well, consistant, and was a lot of fun. Leaving the line at 5500RPM, and crossing the stripe at 7800RPM is something that takes a bit of a toll on parts, especially in a car that weighed in at a heafty 3545#. Every 3rd weekend it would use a qt of oil. Too much oil on the crank is not a good thing so I never worried about keeping it full, just added that qt. Once I got cylinder leak numbers in the high 90s where I wanted them (96 and 97%), I switched to 20-50 Amsoil. Now I went into this with info learned 2 yrs prior as to which synthetics actually worked, actually made power vs standard mineral oil. Interestingly, Mobil 1 was the worst offender in regard to parasitic drag, worse than std mineral oil! The top 3 were Red Line, Torco, and Amsoil, and all 3 (within a couple HP) actually made over 50HP in a 1000HP naturally aspirated race engine. As proof the test engine went back to mineral oil and settled in to within a couple HP of it's original reading on min oil.
Back to my engine, while I may have had some dillusions of power I could feel, I was confident in my choice. The car was .05 quicker and 2MPH faster in every condition I recorded. It also stopped burning that qt of oil every 3rd race weekend and always looked new when I pulled the stick. Having a "spare bullet" in the shop, I took a risky position. I left that oil in there for over 150 passes down the 1/4 mile. Worried a bit, I swapped out the filter and added a qt, and I cut the filter apart for inspection. It was like new inside, my oil mods were doing their job (modified dist housing, lifter gallery mods), and the engine was reading 97 and 98% in a leak down test. All in, I ran that oil for over 400 passes with 1 filter change. When the #6 cylinder developed a crack (common issue), a complete tear down revealed bearings that looked maybe a week old. I saved the oil and threw it in my high mileage F-250.
So what's the point? Top grade synthetics don't burn like mineral oil. They have superior lubrication qualities, and in independent testing seem to prove their worth. The burning of engine oil at the rings is one of the biggest factors in why it turns black. Let it go on long enough, and the soot, microscopic as it may be, is what colors it. After thousands of miles it will eventually sieze the rings, load up on the valve stems, and clog passages. Use an oil that doesn't burn there (many synths burn at much higher temps and burn cleaner), that issue is reduced. As silly as it sounds, oil doesn't ever truly break down. Their additive packages go away (burn away), they get loaded with soot (abraisive), and then it's off to be recycled and refilled with the additives. Throwing away dark oil after 350 miles? You'll spend 1/2 of that $3500 in around 30K miles, maybe less. Now if you only drive the car 500 miles a year it'll take a while. But what fun is that? FWIW, an air filter is a big help in keeping the crankcase clean. A filtered case vent helps too.
That's been my experience with oil experiments. I run Amsoil in my 170HP snowmobile too. Had a lean burn down in my other Amsoiled sled once, and after 5500 miles of abuse the inside of that engine was like new as well. I trust it, but anyone thinking about switching needs to consider going up a grade or 2 from what their engine likes. Yeah, this is like building a clock for someone asking the time, but I thought I'd share.