Hi, I am assembling my 1930 Sport Coup following an off the frame body repair (rust galore).
Background: My father bought this car about 1960 and completely redid the brakes, new shoes, emergency back plates, etc. The car has been used off and on for the past 54 years as a back road jalopy (and probably only been driven about 300 miles in that time). The past few years I had been having problems with the right rear emergency brake grabbing, which eventually resulted in that backing plate being very mangled. I bought a new one with the plan to install it when the body went back on...ie now. I removed the old back plate and installed the new one (reaming the toggle bushing, etc), and putting on the new toggle lever spring (thanks to previous threads for making that task not too bad). When I tried to hookup the emergency brake level actuating rod, I had some positioning problems (could not get the levers aligned to put the two pins in, so I investigated the left emergency brake mechanism (previously untouched and working fine). I found that the left toggle had limited rotation and was sloppy. I disassembled the left side and found the toggle bushing/toggle shaft to be a problem...tried to disassemble, and bent the back plate....so ordered a new plate (and toggle). So, now I had two new back plates with good fitting bushings.
The brakes shoes appeared to be in good condition and I attempted to reuse. When I went to install the drum on the left side, I found that the drum was binding on the emergency brake shoe even with the toggle released (to ensure the shoe was fully retracted). I checked the shoe and it is sitting uniformly on the back plate. The drum appears to be in good condition. I lightly sanded both ( in case of the odd burr), but had the same result, the drum was severely binding even with the toggle fully released.
I turned my attention back to the right side, and essentially found the same problem...worse, I cannot even get the drum over the fully retracted emergency shoe, tried the same thing...sanding, looking for high points, etc...nada.
So to summarize: All parts are the same (and were functioning...absent the right occasional lockup with mangled back plate), except for two new backing plates . Both right and left shoes appear to be in good condition and the drums appears to be good.
Something is not the right dimensions, or not "round", both back plates are new, and bought almost two years apart, the shoes are from the brake job 50 years ago, and had fit ok, the drums are unchanged. I measured the shoe lining/metal band and found 0.30 inches thick uniformly. Since the only thing I replaced is the back plates, I conclude that the dimensions of the new replacement back plates are slightly larger than what was installed 50 years ago.
So, my questions:
Is the brake shoe/bank thickness ok (0.30 inches), or is this too thick?
Could the brakes drums (not sure if replacements of 50 years ago, or new...suspect much older as they have some scoring in the service brake area...and we have never worn the brakes that much in 50 years) be slightly smaller than spec.?
Are the replacement back plate dimensions slightly off? (I found no complaints about this on the forum).
Any suggestions are appreciated!
Ethan Brand
Roscommon, MI
Background: My father bought this car about 1960 and completely redid the brakes, new shoes, emergency back plates, etc. The car has been used off and on for the past 54 years as a back road jalopy (and probably only been driven about 300 miles in that time). The past few years I had been having problems with the right rear emergency brake grabbing, which eventually resulted in that backing plate being very mangled. I bought a new one with the plan to install it when the body went back on...ie now. I removed the old back plate and installed the new one (reaming the toggle bushing, etc), and putting on the new toggle lever spring (thanks to previous threads for making that task not too bad). When I tried to hookup the emergency brake level actuating rod, I had some positioning problems (could not get the levers aligned to put the two pins in, so I investigated the left emergency brake mechanism (previously untouched and working fine). I found that the left toggle had limited rotation and was sloppy. I disassembled the left side and found the toggle bushing/toggle shaft to be a problem...tried to disassemble, and bent the back plate....so ordered a new plate (and toggle). So, now I had two new back plates with good fitting bushings.
The brakes shoes appeared to be in good condition and I attempted to reuse. When I went to install the drum on the left side, I found that the drum was binding on the emergency brake shoe even with the toggle released (to ensure the shoe was fully retracted). I checked the shoe and it is sitting uniformly on the back plate. The drum appears to be in good condition. I lightly sanded both ( in case of the odd burr), but had the same result, the drum was severely binding even with the toggle fully released.
I turned my attention back to the right side, and essentially found the same problem...worse, I cannot even get the drum over the fully retracted emergency shoe, tried the same thing...sanding, looking for high points, etc...nada.
So to summarize: All parts are the same (and were functioning...absent the right occasional lockup with mangled back plate), except for two new backing plates . Both right and left shoes appear to be in good condition and the drums appears to be good.
Something is not the right dimensions, or not "round", both back plates are new, and bought almost two years apart, the shoes are from the brake job 50 years ago, and had fit ok, the drums are unchanged. I measured the shoe lining/metal band and found 0.30 inches thick uniformly. Since the only thing I replaced is the back plates, I conclude that the dimensions of the new replacement back plates are slightly larger than what was installed 50 years ago.
So, my questions:
Is the brake shoe/bank thickness ok (0.30 inches), or is this too thick?
Could the brakes drums (not sure if replacements of 50 years ago, or new...suspect much older as they have some scoring in the service brake area...and we have never worn the brakes that much in 50 years) be slightly smaller than spec.?
Are the replacement back plate dimensions slightly off? (I found no complaints about this on the forum).
Any suggestions are appreciated!
Ethan Brand
Roscommon, MI