Re: Egge versus “Offenhauser” Pistons
I have not used either of them in years, but I know that some of the Egge cast pistons had a piston crown that was similar to some of the Ford pistons -- with more of a "pointed" center (actually used a multiple radius/ellipse shape - see the last sketch).
Given that most after-market heads used a consistent radius dome, sometimes these cast pistons would want to hit the heads in the middle of the chamber. Due to this issue, I've seen engines where somebody took a file or grinder to the piston crowns to get the heads to fit (crude solution).
The solution was that I made a 3D CAD design and we had to CNC the chambers of the heads to match the piston shape (expensive operation). I would review my heads (which I believe you'll find to have a consistent radius like Ross pistons uses). If so, then make sure your pistons are made with the same shape.
You really want your piston shapes to match your head combustion chamber shapes, such that you can achieve a consistent .040 to .045 "squish" above the piston. I can't stress enough how important having a tight and consistent squish is for flathead performance. I've seen plenty of poorly running flatheads - due to having a too big of a squish above the pistons. Did they run . . . "Yes" . . . did they run as they should have . . . "No". To achieve this squish, it requires the right parts (piston crowns and chambers that match), some measuring with aluminum foil balls or clay and typically some work (milling) of the heads. Make sure you check your valve-to-head clearances while you're at it.
The following diagrams will help you see the issue - you might want to review it with your sales folks at Egge:
Egge Cast Profile - notice how the center is deeper and more pointed:
Ross / Edelbrock Heads Profile
Ross / Edelbrock Heads Sketch
Egge Sketch (Parametric - used to drive the profile for CNC)
