FrankWest
Well-known member
good idea...Can I tack weld it?
Condenser for 1933 model B
- Thread starter FrankWest
- Start date
good idea...Can I tack weld it?
35fordtn
Well-known member
No that would create too much heat. You have to VERY quickly solder it or use a product called lab metal it is a conductive epoxy
1957monarchtpc
Junior Member
How about a 1933-34 Condenser for a Model C? Wasn’t a B the 1932 Four Banger?
DavidG
Well-known member
Misconceptions abound: there was no Model C, but rather a continuation of the Model B. All '32-'34 four-cylinder heads had a cast-in capital letter C to distinguish them from the Motel A head with a cast-in capital letter B. That did not make a so-eqluipped Model A into a Model B, nor were '32-'34 fours Model Cs with their original standard heads. There's a simple acid test, simply provide a single Ford document that makes reference to '33-'34s as Model Cs. Good luck!
The ignition systems of '33-'34 fours are identical in all respects to the '32 four-cylinder ignition system.
Ford did not manufacture the ignition condensers that they used on their cars. Like today, more 50 per cent of a '33 Ford was manufactured by outside suppliers.
And original NOS four-cylinder condensers are not that hard to find.
William Shakespeare penned a term that is an appropriate subtitle for this entire thread.
The ignition systems of '33-'34 fours are identical in all respects to the '32 four-cylinder ignition system.
Ford did not manufacture the ignition condensers that they used on their cars. Like today, more 50 per cent of a '33 Ford was manufactured by outside suppliers.
And original NOS four-cylinder condensers are not that hard to find.
William Shakespeare penned a term that is an appropriate subtitle for this entire thread.
Last edited:
alexiskai
Well-known member
The Comedy of Errors
rockfla
Well-known member
Alexiskai
After DavidG's post "I" was going to post "Two come to mind" (yours & David's) and that I "think" I could figure out which one DavidG was referring to....BUT I figured most would consider it "pot stirring".......SINCE you stirred the pot.....My hunch was right!!!!
Last edited:
