As food for thought, let me site something that I hear alot when talking with prospective customers. I have many that call and tell me they are seeking a complete restoration but they don't want a show car. I ask them exactly WHAT is a 'show car' or a "show car paint job", ...and usually there is a silence on the other end. The general response is something like "one that is too nice." I then ask them explain what "too nice" is. Again, ...long silence. I then take the lead and ask them if a new 2010 Ford automobile at the dealership has 'show car paint' on it. The typical answer is "Why no". I then ask them if the paint should be better --or equal to this new vehicle which I generally hear, "Well, ...maybe a little better quality." I point out that this new vehicle has no scratches or dents, and the fenders & doors all align with the other panels, --and the paint is shiney throughout. So if that same mindset is applied to a 'restoration', how do most "restorations" stack up against a new vehicle?
The next part of this is the misused term 'Driver'. In many cases, the term 'Show Car' can be likened to what a decorated Easter Egg is. Something that looks good but not good for much else. Naturally you can do other things with an Easter egg, but the main purpose for decorating an Easter egg is just to look at it. I personally feel the term 'Driver' is often overrated simply because many of those cars are actually NOT a good driver. Stuff generally doesn't work properly. If you go purchase a 2010 new vehicle, you expect everything to look good, AND function properly because you plan to drive it. A "Driver" so to speak!! Why shouldn't the same mindset apply to a "frame-up restoration" that is termed a "Driver"?