I have been trying to design a closed PCV system for my 1946 C69A motor that has an older Navarro Super Dual Intake.
I have seen the hidden versions designed by several members, but I would prefer to have the valve serviceable and I don't like the idea of putting hose inside the engine.
Would either of the following work (if not where have I gone wrong)...
Thanks,
George
From my prospective you are over engineering a PCV system, the same is true of the common system that requires removing the intake manifold and the placement of a PCV within the engine.
A good functioning PCV system needs a good fresh air source. That can be achieved via the stock oil fill tube breather located on the top of the fuel pump stand on a '32-48 engine. The 8BA-8CM are slightly different due to the location of the fill tube.
If the engine in question has a crankcase breather located on the left front portion of the pan, the vent must be closed off.
A good source of vacuum must be supplied, via an area below the carb throttle plate.
When dealing with a flat-head Ford a location for a threaded type of PCV (Ford used this style for years on the 292 V8's and 240 6 cyln engines.) The port into the intake manifold has to be located away from the air intake end of the engine, making sure it is not into the vacuum chamber.
A baffle has to be fabricated on the bottom side of the intake manifold so the PCV can't suck oil into the PCV. The baffle is simply a small vented can or a U shaped plate attached to the bottom of the intake manifold casting.
I have not owned a vehicle, regardless of the year and/or engine style during the past thirty plus years that I have not fitted a PCV to.
I would not recommend a hose running to the air cleaner for a fresh air source, the volume would not be sufficient to provide good ventilation.