J and M Machine
Senior Member
I'm having a hard time trying to decide between using a counterbalanced or stock crankshaft. I like the low end torque of the stock crankshaft and stock flywheel but not the vibration that comes with it. I am impressed with the smoothness of a counterbalanced crank and lightened flywheel with a v8 pressure plate. I realize there is a huge difference in cost. What are the implications of using a stock flywheel and a counterbalanced crankshaft??
If your engine is balanced properly you will be satisfied and save money in stock configuration.
We often hear this argument that the counterweighted crank is better and smoother.Fact is that the description is wrong as a stock crankshaft and engine internals can be balanced to run smoothly.
Ford balanced every engine; reason they run rough is that over the years everyone has been into the engines and changed parts,throwing the balance off.
However if you so choose to get a counterweighted crankshaft you still have to balance rods/pistons and pressure plate and flywheel to get a balanced engine.
There is no reason to "lighten" flywheel to have a smooth running engine or reduce the flywheel weight with a counterweighted crankshaft.
As long as everything is balanced professionally it will run well without issue.
http://www.jandm-machine.com/balancing.html