I will dare to take slight exception to Kube's point regarding "torsional twist". As the spring flexes with wheel reaction to road conditions, the angle of the shackle to the spring, and to the spring perch changes by maybe as much as 15 degrees, which the rubber part resists and then gives back. That force is negligible compared to the resistance forces of the spring, and contributes little if anything to the riding quality. Most of the damping force (anti-bouncing) is contributed by the shock absorbers, with a little contributed by friction between the spring layers.
The whole point of having rotational flexing within the spring shackles was to avoid having that rotation occur between wearing surfaces that are totally exposed to dirt and dust. It would have been a risk of rapid wear with the great danger of the spring eye wearing thin on neglected cars (most of them).
I hope you got a picture of your old spring shackles with weight on the car. That would show you the proper orientation of the square part of the shackle to the spring eye, or close enough. The picture attached is the front spring eye on the stock spring I took out of my '41 when I put in reversed eye springs. If you put yours in at that angle, you should have little trouble getting the square holes in the shackles to line up. It helps to file a little bevel on the edges of the holes in the shackles. That way if you are close, a little tap with a hammer will pop the shackle onto the square peg.