32-33 or 33-32 ? Experts ?

deuce lover

deuce lover

Well-known member
buddy down under sent this pic to me.Opinions ?
 

Attachments

  • 32-33 or 33-32 ?.jpg
    32-33 or 33-32 ?.jpg
    60.5 KB · Views: 385
Ir appears to be a Australian '34. Note the gap between the body and the running board (and the straight hood louvers).


In my opinion, the '32 radiator shell, grill, and headlamp bar add nothing. To each, his own.
 
You can see the deuce frame clearly under the door.Running board looks 32 also. Cowl from hood to A pillar is shorter than '32. Prototype?
 
There are many odd details of these cars e.g. too small (and flat glass) headlights for 32 and 34, the front wheels looks smaller than 17 - 18", the body rear hump looks like 32, not 34. The grille shell is not colour matched with the hood and the front fenders are skirted like the 34.


I believe this clone is AI generated......
 
BlueNotes said:
There are many odd details of these cars e.g. too small (and flat glass) headlights for 32 and 34, the front wheels looks smaller than 17 - 18", the body rear hump looks like 32, not 34. The grille shell is not colour matched with the hood and the front fenders are skirted like the 34.


I believe this clone is AI generated......
Click to expand...

The fit of the grille to the hood is wonky. It looks to be taller than the hood and the fit at the top corner is very poor. The old saying "Seeing is believing" just is not the same anymore.
 
I've seen this discussed on Facebook too. Some comments were wondering if Flouescent lighting was even used back then ? A lot thought it was AI.

Sal
 
This on facebook as others stated has made it's rounds and it's AI created. Only a lower door hinge on the LH door. This AI stuff is getting rather scary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top