Lots if info out there for our EFV8s. What I was wondering if there is a definitive method of evaluating springs? Seems like the effectiveness of a spring is based on the temper of the steel.
I’ve heard of NOS springs being installed and the car “standing up” to factory position.
Is there a body to ground measurement or spring measurement?
Or how are they evaluated...
While on the subject of springs is there any experience with re arching via re tempering?
Thank you in advance.
Tim, Yes, there are specifications of the engineered ride height. I don't have all of them for a '35. However, to the TOP of the roof, you should have 68".
I'll keep looking as I know I have specs to the fender openings.
The cars were designed to sit quite level.
I do know from all of the '39 + '40 Fords I've restored, the factory spec is darn "right on the money" when my cars are completed.
I
always install NOS springs.
As a side note of sorts, re-arcing is poop. I'm speaking specifically about "cold work" done by many spring shops. It's the poor man's way to bring a car back to spec - kind of / sort of. Problems with this method? The shops can't replicate the factory specs on the springs by simply hammering it in a press.
Proper re-arcing requires at minimum - heat treating. Post #2 goes a bit in to depth about spring manufacturing.
I always get a laugh when guys ask what width a spring should be.
Um, what width under
what load?
My advice? Find NOS springs. They're out there. Typically around $175 each.
By the way, when I'd purchased my '36 roadster a couple of years ago, I'd soon thereafter swapped the springs with NOS. All four corners lifted approximately a full 2".
Now the car appears like it was designed to appear.
Plus, with all other chassis components replaced and / or rebuilt PROPERLY, the designed ride and handling characteristics are returned.