1932 phaeton measurement needed

The 2490 figure was U.S. production only (actually that number was 2491). There were 5251 '32 model phaetons produced worldwide; of those, 771 were produced in Australia. (Page 3 of Appendix A-4 of "The 1932 Ford Book, a Production Chronicle and Restoration Guide" from The Early Ford V-8 Club of America.)
 
Gearheadbill where did you get the sheetmetal to replace the 2x4's in the floor?
Chisel

The pics show the body as purchased by me. As far as I can tell this is how it was made originally. I have attached another picture of an aussie floor.
 

Attachments

  • 32 wood2.jpg
    32 wood2.jpg
    64.4 KB · Views: 61
The 2490 figure was U.S. production only (actually that number was 2491). There were 5251 '32 model phaetons produced worldwide; of those, 771 were produced in Australia. (Page 3 of Appendix A-4 of "The 1932 Ford Book, a Production Chronicle and Restoration Guide" from The Early Ford V-8 Club of America.)


well with the 2491 + 771 being US and Ausie built that leaves another 1989 built elsewhere in the world , Argentina, Britain, Germany etc., can anybody identify other unique differences in those cars? I see the last pic of the 3 above in gearheadbill's post it appears that the body has a removable rear panel and wooden interior structure making it a half and half USA / Australian design. I am interested to know more. Dave
 
well with the 2491 + 771 being US and Ausie built that leaves another 1989 built elsewhere in the world , Argentina, Britain, Germany etc., can anybody identify other unique differences in those cars? I see the last pic of the 3 above in gearheadbill's post it appears that the body has a removable rear panel and wooden interior structure making it a half and half USA / Australian design. I am interested to know more. Dave

Does anyone know what the Argentine bodies looked like?
 
Re 'Foreign bodied Fords' [coachwork], situation varied in different markets.
Many countries just received US/Canadian bodies either 'built up' or knocked down [ eg. NZ, Sth Africa, Sth America etc.]. Other countries, due to certain govt. regulations & import tax to protect/promote local industry & jobs, required 'local content'[ eg. Australia, Britain & many European countries]. Australian bodies used a lot of wood framing [like the US Murray & Briggs built Ford bodies] because it was cheaper option for low production runs & less steel stamping forges required at factory.
Ford Australia had a lot of forges & presses to make & build coachwork from Model A era on, but all chassis,fenders& fronts imported. They also imported certain body panels also but there was a lot of local content.It varied from year to year, depending on current govt regulation & factory capabilitiy.
In Britain, for US type Fords,from '32 Briggs had its own factory & designed Tudors & Fordors for European preferences. They imported other types from Canada.
Ford was always an International company & would do different things for different markets . They wanted to sell cars.
 
I have a '32 Australian Phaeton it is completely assembled i measure 50 1/2" inside of 'B' pillars where front doors latch and 52 1/2" inside of 'C' pillars where back doors hinge. Both msmts at the top of pillars. I see from your pixs your pillars are hollow and no flange at the top inward and down...mine are capped with metal.
 
I have a '32 Australian Phaeton it is completely assembled i measure 50 1/2" inside of 'B' pillars where front doors latch and 52 1/2" inside of 'C' pillars where back doors hinge. Both msmts at the top of pillars. I see from your pixs your pillars are hollow and no flange at the top inward and down...mine are capped with metal.

Thanks for posting those dimensions. Very close to what another FordBarn'er sent me via PM and what I have been using since then.

The B pillars had a 3 piece hardwood "inner" structure or core with the sheetmetal wrapped around and wood-tacked in place. The B pillars are so fundamental to the structure of the car and getting the doors to close etc. that I am replacing the wood in them w/steel. Not entirely proper but I believe it will be a wise decision functionally.
 
Back
Top