ID on a fuel sending unit 16H-9275

Husker402

Junior Member
I’m having difficulty finding the correct vehicle(s) application for a Ford sending unit with part number 16H-9275. It is outwardly similar to an 8A-9275 but with a slightly shorter arm. I also wanted to check to see if this was a 6 volt or 12 volt. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
16H prefix is Lincoln. The sending unit itself is the same as Ford King Seeley units . The arms are the difference . The sending unit doesn’t care if it’s 6 volt or 12 volt but it’s the gauge that cares.
 
I’m having difficulty finding the correct vehicle(s) application for a Ford sending unit with part number 16H-9275. It is outwardly similar to an 8A-9275 but with a slightly shorter arm. I also wanted to check to see if this was a 6 volt or 12 volt. Thanks in advance.

All of the 1956 thermal King-Seeley fuel sending units which are 12v (outwardly identical to all other thermal sending units) are always dual spade and stamped '12v' on the body.
 
The numbering system Ford used for Lincoln parts had an H identifier. The 1 in 16 is for 1941 The 6 in that number is likely an engine identifier form parts designed in 1941. The Ford numbering system was 11 for a 1941 221 CID engine and 19 for a 239 engine. The Lincoln V12 engines were manufactured in three different displacements with the last one being the 306 from 1942 with a gap to 1946 and later after the war. The numbering system changed after the war in 1951 so it changed to an alpha prefix with a decade code such as A for the 1940s, B for the 1950s, and so on. B6 would be 1956. My 1951 Mercury cars have a lot of Lincoln part number prefixes in the R10 overdrive transmission parts due to the initial development on the Lincoln cars.

The 16H part number prefix is pre 1956 when the change to 12-volt happened so it is likely designed for 6-volt systems. The King Seeley systems were current pulse systems beginning in 1936 and running well into the early 1960s. Some of the 12-volt systems likely had a voltage regulator in the line that was also a current pulse based system, to lower the voltage for the instruments. I don't think the 1956 systems used a voltage regulator but they did in 1957 and later cars.
 
Last edited:
Thank you everyone for the information….was quite informative and I’m glad I asked. The vehicle this is intended for is 6volt so I should be OK. The arm seems to be the correct length for my needs.
 
And the arm should be able to be tweaked (bent) to match your particular tank.

The sender should be able to move thru its full travel just before the float gets stopped by floor or ceiling of tank. If you can't get both, accuracy near empty tank is more important.
 
You should test your setup before installing the fuel sending unit into the tank.

With your fuel gauge fully installed and wired in the dash, connect the fuel sending unit wire to the fuel sender (outside of the tank), then run a ground wire to the frame/mt flange of the fuel sending unit (use a surface which you know is getting a good ground on the vehicle...fresh paint etc is good at insulating things) and then turn the ignition on and operate the fuel sending unit armature up and down to confirm your gauge responds appropriately. Keep in mind that thermal sending units do not respond quickly so give it a minute or two at both full and empty. If your fuel gauge immediately pegs past hot, kill the ignition and abort mission.
 
Back
Top