Four or six bladed fan? I need more cooling. 2 blade is not enough, I don't care what Henry did.
Preferences? Evidence based opinions?
I want to try the fan first, before a shroud possibility.
Clean block, actually the cleanest block you can have. Radiator was cleaned and repaired, original.
60/40 antifreeze solution. Engine pans are in place. Have a license plate because it's law.
Running a temperature gauge in the neck.
Have a thermostat with the thermostat knocked out, so a 1 inchish hole to slow the water down. Before knocking the thermostat out, car would overheat on hills easily.
Climbing hills at 7,000+ feet on 100 degree days is tough, to the point of pulling over and waiting.
50mph on 100 degree days is running between 185 and 190. Car is loaded pretty well. When it's 80 degrees out car will run 5-10 degrees cooler.
While this was stationary tests: https://www.tulsamodelafordclub.com/model-a-fan-air-flow/
4 blade is significantly more air. There is another article out there from years ago, but the scan is too small to read by Ed Rossig.
If you have a wind perpendicular to or behind the car, the air flow through the radiator might not be the "doesn't matter above 35mph" that you think it is.
H2O with antirust and pump lub will run 20-30 *F cooler than antifreeze, above 35 mph and fans slow the airflow through the radiator so that’s maybe why Ford went with the 2 bladed fans . Doing a good chemical flush of the cooling system would be what I would do first.
If you speed the water flow up too much it drops down through the core,then back to the block without transferring it's heat.If you shoot the heat number at the top of the core while running,then the bottom of the core while running,there should be a substantial difference in temperature.If the temp difference isn't a lot,then the water is running through it too fast,or the radiator still isn't working right,new or old.
Clean block, actually the cleanest block you can have. Radiator was cleaned and repaired, original.
60/40 antifreeze solution. Engine pans are in place. Have a license plate because it's law.
Running a temperature gauge in the neck.
Have a thermostat with the thermostat knocked out, so a 1 inchish hole to slow the water down. Before knocking the thermostat out, car would overheat on hills easily.
Climbing hills at 7,000+ feet on 100 degree days is tough, to the point of pulling over and waiting.
50mph on 100 degree days is running between 185 and 190. Car is loaded pretty well. When it's 80 degrees out car will run 5-10 degrees cooler.
While this was stationary tests: https://www.tulsamodelafordclub.com/model-a-fan-air-flow/
4 blade is significantly more air. There is another article out there from years ago, but the scan is too small to read by Ed Rossig.
If you have a wind perpendicular to or behind the car, the air flow through the radiator might not be the "doesn't matter above 35mph" that you think it is.
In terms of my mind being made up, I just want proof, not "Mine's never overheated so....".
I've watched the temp gauge bounce, which is from the cavitation,etc like you say, but it will average at the numbers I say. I've also seen the temp gauge bounce due to wind being front, back, or side.
It freezes where I live, and I don't have time to drain, refill, drain, refill with different coolants depending on where I want to drive or what weather pattern is coming.
I literally posted a link that shows that a 4 blade fan pulls more air. Is the study wrong? Is there a different study that shows different?
When pulling a hill, the engine RPM is high, but ground speed is low, well below 35 mph. The 4/6 blade fan would be better right?
Would a shroud be more effective than a multi blade fan?
Water flow capacity through the radiator is not the same as heat disappation.