Condenser
- Thread starter Ricosan
- Start date
Kube
Super Moderator
Just a little solder will work fine. I've done this very same thing with a Hunt's Magneto condenser.
jimvette59
Well-known member
I would use a low temp solder and flux. Good advice Kube.
Bored&Stroked
Well-known member
Given the amount of time you're putting into this - and that you probably don't want the condenser to fail, you might consider using a higher quality magneto condenser instead of the NAPA stuff. It used to be that NAPA supplied high quality condensers - now it seems that too many of them fail . . . usually at the worst possible time. Consider buying a .36uF Vertex magneto condenser - Bubba should have them. They are not cheap - but they are about the only type of condenser that I run these days.
Kube
Super Moderator
That's what the Joe Hunt Magneto condensers are that I use. I believe that's where "bubba" gets his. About $30 but well worth it in my opinion.
TerryOH
Well-known member
Don't use the FA5 for a V8 it has the capacitance for a 4 Cyl.
As mentioned above the magneto Cap. is the way to go but you can not use the same mounting technique since the magneto Cap. has a wire lead.
Keep the internals of the old Cap. away from you since it is carcinogenic.
As mentioned above the magneto Cap. is the way to go but you can not use the same mounting technique since the magneto Cap. has a wire lead.
Keep the internals of the old Cap. away from you since it is carcinogenic.
Bored&Stroked
Well-known member
I'll bet I've killed the sale of about 100 sales of my "Trash Cans" by recommending these when "lookin' good" is not important.
It's for the good of the hobby. (Obsession?)
But, you are one solid dude . . . and we appreciate it!
IH-200 is a magneto condenser that works and lasts for years with
no point damage. Skip has sold hundreds of them. G.M.
lotsagas4u
Well-known member
According to Michael at Third Gen he has found a quality replacement also.
tubman
Well-known member
I will have to challenge this statement. The capacitance of a condenser is best determined by several factors, the two most important being coil inductance and the optimum speed of the engine. I have not done any research on early (pre-war) Ford coils, but from what I have seen, early Fords seem to have required more capacitance than current can coils. Because of age and attrition, there are few (if any) original early Ford coils actually being used these days, and just about everyone is using something more modern. Most modern "can" coils (and, I believe "Skip's coils) are of modern manufacture and, in fact, are better suited to condensers in the lower 20's range (which most modern capacitors are). I believe the long-time .36 micro-farad recommendation is just a "hangover" from the old Mallory "trash can" condensers that were so popular 40 or 50 years ago. That recommendation seems to be just an expression of the old "if some is good, more is better" convention.
In all actuality, the actual capacitance of the condenser is not that important as long as it is within reason. For most uses, a .22 is as good, if not better than a .36. What is more important is the ability to with stand the voltage spikes present in the "dirty" power from cars with generators, as well as the heat and vibration encountered in day to day automotive operation.
I have a pre-war Ford document on my computer in Florida that list the condensers they supplied with their distributors back in the day and shows capacitances from the low .20's to the low .40's, as well as the interesting statement that "too low a capacitance will accelerate point wear, while too much capacitance will hurt performance".
Bored&Stroked
Well-known member
Just to add some more mud to the situation, there are two main Vertex magneto condensers - one at .28uF and the heavier duty one (designed for the higher output versions of the mag - usually the external coil versions) that is .036uF. Also, the .28uF is about $15 - $18 while the .36uF one is pushing $40. I see no reason not to try the .28uF version . . . maybe I'll order a few and report back.
The challenge is that I'm sure they will work just fine on my distributor machine - only time will tell on actual usage on cars.
The challenge is that I'm sure they will work just fine on my distributor machine - only time will tell on actual usage on cars.
tubman
Well-known member
It's not all that hard to understand. In my earlier post, I said that one of the factors that effects condenser capacitance is engine speed. The faster an engine turns, the more sparks are needed per time period, and more capacitance is required to absorb all of the extra energy produced per time period. The magnetos being mentioned here are units intended specifically for racing, where engine RPM's are much higher than for a normal street driven car. In such a case, the accelerated point deterioration caused by low speed operation is acceptable. I also believe this was Mallory's reason for making their "Trash Cans" with a higher capacitance (.36 micro-farads) than normal, as their condensers, too, were intended to be used on "racing units".
The question is point deterioration. If you can accept possible accelerated point wear, the magneto condensers will work just fine on the street. In the final analysis, unless it's way out in left field, the actual difference in capacitance in the condensers available manifests itself only in differing rates of point deterioration.
The question is point deterioration. If you can accept possible accelerated point wear, the magneto condensers will work just fine on the street. In the final analysis, unless it's way out in left field, the actual difference in capacitance in the condensers available manifests itself only in differing rates of point deterioration.