I feel i wasted a lot of time messing with the rears. I would just do the fronts if i were to do it again.
Generally speaking, if everything was new in the front and the FHT added later made a huge improvement, then the shoes were not properly centered.
We have been using the floaters that Snyders sells. No complaints from the owners cars we have installed them on.
https://www.snydersantiqueauto.com/brake-floater-kit
I must say I am impressed. The car REALLY stops good now. The pedal feels similar to power brakes.
Just make sure the rest of your system is in good shape because the FHTs kit isn't designed to cure defective brakes.
I think it has to do more with the "Self Energizing Concept" as described in the article in Model A Times.
My shoes were all arced and centered properly.
I have them installed and quite honestly I have so many other problems with my brakes can't really comment on them. But I do have a question as I have been reading a lot about brakes. How many of you successful installs have taken off the top springs and does that make a significant difference. Thanks!!
Can we all agree that even without the Flat Head Ted system that the rear shoe is self energizing. If we can agree with that, then we should agree that with the Flat Head Ted system the front shoe is also self energizing. Two self energizing shoes being better that one hence the feeling of power brakes. In the old days when race cars and motorcycles had drum brakes double leading shoes were very common. The Flat Head Ted system is a way of getting some of the effect of a double leading shoe system without all the engineering that goes into a double leading shoe system.
Ummm, I don't believe I could not agree to that. It is self-centering but not self-energizing.