Y-Blockhead
Well-known member
Nice looking car. Nothing looks better, in my eyes than a dressed flat motor (except for a dressed Y-Block
On a side note, I know a Y-Block fits. I had a 292 in a '38. Had to use the T-Bird pan, rear sump.
One last option, then I'll shut up. Speedway Motors has a C-4 to Flathead Adapter if you want an auto. But then you would have to convert to a open drive line.
Expensive short water pump ? NAH! Just like Chevys Ford also had a short and a long pump stock. Read post #5On the sbf, they are really long for a compact engine. There is a shorter (expensive) water pump you can get. Although my "29" is a rod I built, the 260 with no fan and the hub about 1 1/2" from the radiator would still be a darn tight fit anywhere else.
On adapters, doesn't Trans-go make a 3 piece that you can pretty much mate any engine to any transmission?
I've got a T5 behind a 260 in my rpu and and love it. Even with twin carbs I can get high 20s for mpg on the road. 30 inch tires and 3.50 gear.
The short pump is 5.42 inches and the long pump is 5.70 according to that read so you gain .28 or a little over 1/4 inch at the hub flange? Hardly any gain at all it seems. I'm a little confused how that ended up being 3-4 inches more clearance.Expensive short water pump ? NAH! Just like Chevys Ford also had a short and a long pump stock. Read post #5
http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/sbf-short-water-pump-pulleys.303600/ First two pictures are 1970 and later long pump the last picture is a 1965-69 short pump both in a 1954 Ford sedan with a 302.
The short pump is 5.42 inches and the long pump is 5.70 according to that read so you gain .28 or a little over 1/4 inch at the hub flange? Hardly any gain at all it seems. I'm a little confused how that ended up being 3-4 inches more clearance.
I'm running a 63 engine and yes, it's a different cover and no tin plate behind the pump. Dam near drove me crazy because I had the engine apart for a while and couldn't find it when I went back together,lol. My 63 has the oil fill in the timing cover but the 64 engine I have has the oil fill in the valve cover.As I recall '64 and earlier pumps were significantly shorter but don't have the specs at hand. I know the early timing cover is needed for the early pump.
You are not taking into account the shorter height of the earlier balancer ,I have helped a lot of guys with 302/5.0 swaps in 1952-56 Fords in my HAMB 1952-59 Group this has worked on many occasions as well as a guy I helped on facebook last month.The short pump is 5.42 inches and the long pump is 5.70 according to that read so you gain .28 or a little over 1/4 inch at the hub flange? Hardly any gain at all it seems. I'm a little confused how that ended up being 3-4 inches more clearance.
That's great to know, if I ever decide to update the engine in one of the fat fendered Fords. I'd like to keep it all Ford and it's about time someone made a decent adapter kit for mating SBFs up to the old Ford drivetrains.
It will be a 6 to 12 months before my new shop is built, sold the house with shop and lift, and have to be out of here by the 13th. I'm glad I got the old flathead replaced before my back surgery and sold my house.
Thanks everyone for the information and links. Will be putting the link and info in next weeks car club meeting minutes. I am the secretary for a large car club and send out a weekly email that contains the meeting minutes. We meet weekly, over 200 members and more than 425 cars. The club is very active.