H. L. Chauvin
Well-known member
Mr. Kuntz,
Per your post #19 ...... I wish you would come back and post more vintage helpful comments.
The Ford Model T Manual is interesting to read about how Ford measured and recommended rebuilding Model T engines with very simple tools.
Vintage mechanics devised many different ingenious ways to do same.
For people used to measuring, one can see that it is easy to even "see" the difference between 1/8" and 3/16"; but it gets more difficult to "see" difference between 6-1/8" & 6-3/16". Even more difficult to see the difference between 3-'0" and 3'-1" from a distance.
Likewise if one measures Model A piston bore diameter of 3-7/8" at bottoms of cylinders say with a vintage steel rod or similar device .......... and measures piston bore diameter of 3-7/8" + 0.005" at tops of pistons, there is a 0.005" difference to "see".
If one uses the vintage ring method you mentioned that was used often back then, with a 0.005" difference in diameter, the gap in the ring at top and bottom with the circumference is 0.0157".
Most vintage mechanics back then could accurately read a feeler gauge ...... and many could actually "see" the difference between 0.005" and 0.015" without a feeler gauge.
Just Plane Geometry, and just one opinion.
Per your post #19 ...... I wish you would come back and post more vintage helpful comments.
The Ford Model T Manual is interesting to read about how Ford measured and recommended rebuilding Model T engines with very simple tools.
Vintage mechanics devised many different ingenious ways to do same.
For people used to measuring, one can see that it is easy to even "see" the difference between 1/8" and 3/16"; but it gets more difficult to "see" difference between 6-1/8" & 6-3/16". Even more difficult to see the difference between 3-'0" and 3'-1" from a distance.
Likewise if one measures Model A piston bore diameter of 3-7/8" at bottoms of cylinders say with a vintage steel rod or similar device .......... and measures piston bore diameter of 3-7/8" + 0.005" at tops of pistons, there is a 0.005" difference to "see".
If one uses the vintage ring method you mentioned that was used often back then, with a 0.005" difference in diameter, the gap in the ring at top and bottom with the circumference is 0.0157".
Most vintage mechanics back then could accurately read a feeler gauge ...... and many could actually "see" the difference between 0.005" and 0.015" without a feeler gauge.
Just Plane Geometry, and just one opinion.