JSeery
Member Emeritus
On the other hand, Mr. Ford thought 160° was right since that's what he put in the operator's manual. The Stant stats don't come in 160° but 170°. I still think that's cool enough. (And hot enough too.) Opinions do definitely vary.
That is not true Henry, that was just the best they could do at the time because of other factors. The limits in technology at the time do not equate to the best approach. Ford engineers (and Henry) were very intelligent folks and understood both thermodynamics and engines. Part of the problem at the time was what was being used for anti-freeze. As soon as the limiting factors were overcome Ford raised the recommend operation temperatures of their engines to take advantage of the factors I listed. Limitations of the era do not change the laws of thermodynamics! The hotter you can run any engine the better (within other limiting factors not related to the thermodynamics of the engine).
I have posted this several times before, quote from 1949-52 Ford Truck shop manual:
"The cooling system used on trucks is the pressure type, having a regulated pressure of 3 1/2 to 4 1/2 pounds maintained in the system while in operation. With this pressure system, the coolant is allowed to reach a higher boiling point. This higher coolant temperature reduces the loss of energy to the coolant and also assists in decreasing internal friction by maintaining a higher lubricating oil temperature."
The laws of physics and thermodynamics had not changed, the technology that allowed them to take advantage of it had. Because of better anti-freeze and other factors we today can also take advantage of the positive factors that improve engine performance with increased engine operating temperature.
Last edited: