robert dick
Senior Member
I would go with an older WCFB 4 barrel or one of the newer Edelbrocks
HB32, why would you use Ross racing pistons in a street engine? Granted, their probably the best racing piston available. However they require excessive piston to wall clearance. Egge, makes a light weight piston that can be fir tight and has a modern ring stack. Back to alittle more research.
Since I started this thread, I researched the death out of the 39-41 Merc and have switched blocks to a C69A 46 Ford. It will be opened up to 3 5/16 with a 4" Merc crank. Pistons will be Ross 3 ring and Manley stainless valves. Cam will be the L-100 which I have read lots of good reviews about. Rotating assembly will be balanced as well. A long way off my original intent which I have digressed from. I appreciate the help to date and still looking for thoughts on a manifold for the change in engine.
Martin, I'll jump in here; the C69A block has massively thick cylinder walls, and is a safer bet for the bigger bores.
I got a set of pistons from them last year thathad rings from a Volvo truck. Not sure if all of there 3 ring pistons have them.
Martin, I'm not gonna argue, but have you ever seen a C69A block?
Yes mate, a C69A block has thicker walls than the 99A/wartime military blocks. Accordingly is my first choice for building big bore engines. However, it is my opinion that the pre 59A series blocks are cast of a better cast iron, dunno, maybe more nickel or something, but the later blocks are definitely cast of a different grade cast iron.
Tim
When I recieved the pistons (3 5/16+.020") I was curious as to what the rings fit. So I looked up the number on the ring box and it fit the 4cyl Volvo truck engine amoung others. Egge also makes a .030" over piston as well.