brake equalizer cross shaft

pat in Santa Cruz

pat in Santa Cruz

Well-known member
I'm working on a late 28 frame that's under a station wagon body. It has the equalizer cross shaft system. Clearly the brackets that hold the cross shafts to the frame do not carry the type of bushings found on the one piece shafts. I cannot find any descriptions nor photos of how the bushings should be supported, or what they look like. The supports and bushings on this car look fishy to me ( see photo) My question is, is this correct? if not, what is?

TIA

6866704081_d7de0ed745_z.jpg
IMG_1289 by tiopato2000, on Flickr
 
Are those the correct brackets for the two-piece cross shafts? The two-piece set-up did not use any type of bushing between the brackets and the shaft, and the brackets were a different shape as well. The shaft just rode in/on the bracket itself.

IMG_0985.jpg


The top bracket in the photo is for the two-piece cross shaft and the lower one is for the later one-piece cross shaft.
 
Here is a photo of one of my 28 cross shaft brackets.
Supergnat
 

Attachments

  • Cross shaft bracket.jpg
    Cross shaft bracket.jpg
    52.5 KB · Views: 380
thanks guys
this all helps. Apparently the shaft or brackets are worn, and the oddball thing is in there to take up the slop. It has the correct brackets, but either they or the shaft is worn so much someone could get a 1/4 inch "shim" in there. I guess the shaft is coming out one of these days to address the looseness. As it is now, it clunks rather loudly on bumps.
 
pat in Santa Cruz said:
thanks guys
this all helps. Apparently the shaft or brackets are worn, and the oddball thing is in there to take up the slop. It has the correct brackets, but either they or the shaft is worn so much someone could get a 1/4 inch "shim" in there. I guess the shaft is coming out one of these days to address the looseness. As it is now, it clunks rather loudly on bumps.
Click to expand...

My 28 Phaeton also makes a loud clunking when ever I go over railroad tracks or hit bumps. I thought it was brake rods, but it may be this linkage. Someone stuck a sliver of wood under the left side top bracket part.
 
Tom Wesenberg said:
My 28 Phaeton also makes a loud clunking when ever I go over railroad tracks or hit bumps. I thought it was brake rods, but it may be this linkage. Someone stuck a sliver of wood under the left side top bracket part.
Click to expand...


maybe the same guy had your phaeton as had my pickup. It had the window felt channel bailing wired to a hatchet-cut stick of wood that was wired to the brackets that were supposed to hold the metal channel.
 
The early 2-piece cross shafts had to have the side to side movement on the ends to equalize the pull between front & rear on both sides of the car.Shoving anything on either side of the cross shaft is defeating the purpose of the original design.
 
columbiA said:
The early 2-piece cross shafts had to have the side to side movement on the ends to equalize the pull between front & rear on both sides of the car.Shoving anything on either side of the cross shaft is defeating the purpose of the original design.
Click to expand...

Sorry, not to be nit-picking, but in order to clarify your statement, don't you mean front to back ? I agree with the rest of your statements. This was actually a better braking system, IMHO, than the later style! (other than the fact that if the frame is "twisted" badly when going through a ditch or over a curb, that the dogbone can fall out! Ever had this happen? Jim :eek:
 
Jim--To me,the side to side movement meant the same as your front to back statement.Maybe I didnt word it right.I know on the earliest brakes the dogbone would sometimes fall out & I think that a little later on there were stops on the frame to try and prevent that from happening.
 
I'm planning to machine the two cross shafts so I can place the split bushing and newer frame bracket on . Is this OK or should I stay with the original brackets and no bushings?

I do not have the individual emergency brake shoes so changing to the single cross shaft would be pricey and take away from the originality more than I'd like.

BTW does anyone have original cross shafts (preferably the second style with the longer tapered socket as shown on the right in the photos) for the equalizer shaft (dog bone)? I need to replace with the same style on each side.
It turns out I have two styles of cross shafts.The very first one on the left and the second style on the right.
 

Attachments

  • Crosshafts.jpg
    Crosshafts.jpg
    135.8 KB · Views: 179
  • Equalizer Shaft.jpg
    Equalizer Shaft.jpg
    139 KB · Views: 170
moasew said:
I'm planning to machine the two cross shafts so I can place the split bushing and newer frame bracket on . Is this OK or should I stay with the original brackets and no bushings?

I do not have the individual emergency brake shoes so changing to the single cross shaft would be pricey and take away from the originality more than I'd like.

BTW does anyone have original cross shafts (preferably the second style with the longer tapered socket as shown on the right in the photos) for the equalizer shaft (dog bone)? I need to replace with the same style on each side.
It turns out I have two styles of cross shafts.The very first one on the left and the second style on the right.
Click to expand...

This is the single cross shaft Ford used for cars with the left hand
emergency brake. It has an extra lever for the emergency brake.

Bob
 

Attachments

  • crossshaft.JPG
    crossshaft.JPG
    86.3 KB · Views: 91
Hi Bob:

Do you have this for sale? I've ordered AR drums (same front and back)
from Mel(Randy Gross) but am wondering if I should order the newer drums to accept the separate emergency brake providing I can get the other parts required. Do I need a totally different backing plates for the rear? What other parts do I need to make the transition to separate E brake and keep the lever on the left.

Thanks

Wilfred
 
moasew said:
Tom:

Would you be able to email a copy of these bulletins . I have Les Andrews book and was told it has these diagrams but not so.

Thanks.

Wilfred
Click to expand...

Sorry, but my scanner/copier doesn't work, so I can't help.

You would need a lot of parts and work to change your rear brakes. I'd keep it stock.
 
Looks like the one in the Service Bulletins to me. It had the part suffix ER. At one time I was looking for one. If I stumble on one at some point I will put it back for future use. Rod
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top