Search results

I've said enough. You're the horse that dies at the water trough.

And the flow ratings I posted have been proven. I can't for the life of my understand someone seeing teh facts presented and not accepting it. There is flow data proof. Maybe if you spent time researching, you'd find enough results to understand?? But I spent a lot of my restoration life in the...

4100s with 1.12 venturis are not 600 cfm. They are low 500s. From about 506 to 528 as I remember. The only 600 cfm 4100 is marked with 1.19 venturis and is very rare. The 1.08 is about 441 cfm and was used on the 289s, etc

Its not marked on the throttle plates. The venturi size is cast into the side of teh carburetor body.

That is not correct that a 1.12 is equal to 600 cfm. These were small carbs. Peop0le think they were around 600, nope!

What's "your" plan with mods??

Re: New huckster wannabee Sounds good. I bought plans, just want to build a cab. But teh plans are very good.

I've built many vehicles in the last 9 years. For myself and customers. The Model A has just been sitting, but I started back up about 6 months ago. Having fun, all new to me.

Still active?? I haven't posted in many many years. But I still am doing the same truck I wanted to do back then. I'm just now fitting engine and steering in it. I still plan on the wood cab and metal bed.

Yep, correct :)

They were delivered different ways. Some had a plug in the hole. Some had nothing but a flat place where it went. Some had the threaded holes for fasteners, but no opening for the gases.

Road draft was absolutely used in the 1965 model year. Absolutely.

Kevin . .what did you find?

I have wanted to build a wood cab, but with a metal bed. I like yours congrats!

?? The reason I posted is the answer.

The reason the 292 was down on HP was that it was a 2V only engine in 1957.

Well this is incorrect. The effective duration @.050 lift is increased when you go to a higher ration rocker. The advertised is not changed, but that is not the number that means the most anyway. YOu are increasing the amount of time the valve is lifted at least .050 . .fact.

This is correct.

I think I know where you are trying to go with this, but what you are saying is not totally true. A large bore, will require more fluid to move a given distance. And hydraulic pressure is created by the ratio of the different bore sizes; MC to WC or caliper. To me the most alarming thing...

and . . . Appears it could be a REO ?