As Charlie S in NY said when he helped me with the 94 on the 8RT, the 94 can be a pain in butt, but the Stromberg is a better carb.
That's a matter of opinion, the Stromberg is a more robust, simpler, easy to get to run "ok" in multiple setups, in the hands of regular Joe. Has a stronger power valve set-up. Has an inferior float setup and stupid way to set the float hight. The fuel curve isn't much cop, it can be good at the top, but bad at the bottom, or vice versa, not good all the way through. The power valve trigger is unrelated to engine demand.
In my opinion.
The 94 is a more efficient carb, better on mpg for the same power, flows more, better float, better way to set the float hight, can handle more fuel pressure, fuel curve is good.
Power valve system is weak against carb backfire, and more difficult to setup in multiple carb setups, lots of ill fitting valves out there. Power valve system is related to engine demand IF the correct rated valve is fitted.
In my opinion.
97's fit every multi carb intake manifolds, 94's don't fit as many.
Mostly down to preference.
This is not to take away from the complexity to correctly rebuild either carb. They both need a real good understanding to do this job properly. The 97 is easyer to "through a kit in it" and "fix it" than the 94, but this isn't to be mistaken for a correct rebuild.
Martin.